Back
NAGESH BHEEMAPAKA
Balde Siddilingam – Appellant
Versus
State of Telangana – Respondent
ORDER
Nagesh Bheemapaka, J. - Vires of G.O.Rt. No. 158, Agriculture & Cooperation (MKT. 1) Department dated 12.01.2024 and the consequent proceedings No. GM-S-III/260303/2020, dated 12.01.2024 issued by the Director of Agriculture Marketing, Hyderabad is questioned in this Writ Petition.
2. Vide said G.O., the Government of Telangana withdrew its pleasure from the Members of Agriculture Market Committee, Jangoan, Jangoan District including Chairman and Vice-Chairman with immediate effect; consequently, the tenure of Members of Agricultural Market Committee, Jangaon including Chairman and Vice-Chairman stands curtailed and they will cease to hold the posts as such with immediate effect. Further, by proceedings dated 12.01.2024, the Director of Agricultural Marketing Committee - 3rd respondent appointed the Regional Deputy Director of Marketing, Warangal as Person-in-charge, Agricultural Market Committee, Jangaon, to manage day-to-day affairs of the Committee until the Market Committee is reconstituted.
3. It is stated that the 1st petitioner is Chairman, the 2nd petitioner is Vice-Chairman and other petitioners are members of the Committee constituted by G.O. Rt No. 117, Agriculture an
The doctrine of pleasure permits removal from office without adherence to principles of natural justice when the appointee does not hold a civil post.
The doctrine of pleasure allows for removal from office without notice or reason, provided it is not arbitrary, and does not apply to those holding civil posts under the Constitution.
The doctrine of pleasure permits removal from office without notice or reason, provided it is not arbitrary, and does not apply to those not holding civil posts under the Constitution.
The court upheld that the removal of appointed members is lawful under the doctrine of pleasure, affirming no violation of natural justice or constitutional rights as per the Societies Registration A....
The doctrine of pleasure does not permit arbitrary or capricious exercise of power by the State, and such actions must comply with principles of fairness and Article 14 of the Constitution.
"Doctrine of Pleasure" has its genesis under common law - A public servant could be dismissed from service by Crown at its pleasure.
The court affirmed that non-elected Prescribed Officers can be removed without notice at the Registrar's discretion under the doctrine of pleasure, and did not possess substantive rights to retain of....
The main legal point established in the judgment is that the Doctrine of Pleasure cannot be invoked in an arbitrary manner, and valid reasons are required for the removal of an appointed member. The ....
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
