SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2022 Supreme(Bom) 193

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD
V. K. Jadhav, Sandipkumar C. More, JJ.
Sachin @ Lakhan s/o Manjabapu Warule – Petitioner
Versus
The State of Maharashtra, through its Principal Secretary, Home Department and ors. – Respondents
Criminal Writ Petition No. 1409, 1410, 1411, 1412 of 2021
Decided On : 30-03-2022

Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Petitioner:Mr. N. B. Narwade, Advocate
For the Respondent: Mr. M. M. Nerlikar, APP

Point of Law : Externment order directing externment of a person from much larger area than the one of his illegal activities, can be made, but it should be based upon some material which provides an objective criteria to the authority for reaching a subjective satisfaction.

Headnote:

Maharashtra Police Act, 1951 - Section 37(1)(3), 55, 59, 60 – Constitution of India, 1950 - Articles 19 (1) (d) and 21 – Indian Penal Code, 1860 – Section 326, 324, 341, 323, 504, 506, 143, 147, 148, 149, 269, 270, 290 – Punishment for voluntarily causing hurt – Punishment for criminal intimidation – Punishment for rioting - Whether crimes are committed by persons or body of persons acting as a gang.

Findings of court : On going through impugned orders, it appears that authorities below have rightly appreciated entire material on record against petitioners in proper perspective with their subjective satisfaction - Moreover, there is presence of live-link since crimes chosen for externment of persons are of year 2020 and externment proposal also appears to be initiated immediately in year 2020 itself - Considering entire material on record, Court come to conclusion that petitioners are involved in serious criminal activities and they have committed serious crimes jointly as a gang - Moreover, there appears application of mind by externing authority and Respondent No.4 has rightly confirmed orders of externment against petitioners with intention to restrict their criminal activities - Thus, considering aforesaid discussion, Court are of opinion that there is no need to interfere with impugned orders of externment passed against petitioners.

Result : Criminal Writ Petitions are dismissed

JUDGMENT :

Sandipkumar C. More, JJ.

1. Rule. Rule made returnable forthwith and heard finally by consent of learned Counsel for respective parties.

2. The petitioners in Criminal Writ Petitions No. 1409/2021, 1411/2021 and 1412/2021, have prayed for quashing and setting aside order dated 26.10.2021, passed by Respondent No.4 i.e. Divisional Commissioner, Nasik Division, Nasik, in their respective Externment Appeals No.78/2021, 80/2021 and 79/2021, confirming the common order dated 14.07.2021, passed by Respondent No.2 i. e. Superintendent of Police, Ahmednagar, in respect of all these three petitioners, whereby said petitioners are externed from the entire area of Ahmednagar district for the period of 15 months.

The petitioner in Criminal Writ Petition No. 1410/2021 has also challenged the order dated 26.10.2021, passed by Respondent No. 4 – Divisional Commissioner, Nasik Division, Nasik in Externment Appeal No. 103/2021, confirming the order dated 23.08.2021, passed by Respondent No. 2 – Superintendent of Police, Ahmednagar, whereby he is externed from the entire area of Ahmednagar district, for the period of 15 months.

3. Though the numbers of Externment Appeals fled by these petitioners before Respondent No. 4 – Divisional Commissioner, Nasik Division, Nasik, are different, but those appeals are arising out of the impugned orders dated 14.07.2021 and 23.08.2021, respectively, passed by Respondent No.2 – Superintendent of Police, Ahmednagar. Vide order dated 14.07.2021, Respondent No.2 has externed three petitioners in Criminal Writ Petitions No. 1409/2021, 1411/2021 and 1412/2021, from the area of entire Ahmednagar district for the period of 15 months, whereas, the same authority has also externed petitioner – Vishal Shaharam Warule, (petitioner in Criminal Writ Petition No. 1410/2021) vide separate order dated 23.08.2021, from the area of entire Ahmednagar district for the period of 15 months.

4. On perusal of all these petitions along with its annexures, it appears that both the authorities have jointly considered the allegations against all these petitioners, being members of a gang and they have been externed under the provisions of Section 55 of the Maharashtra Police Act, 1951 (herein after referred to as “the said Act”). We, therefore, find it proper to dispose of all these four petitions by a common judgment.

5. The background facts of this case are as under:

On 15.05.2021, Respondent No. 2 – Superintendent of Police, Ahmednagar, had issued a notice under Section 59 of the said Act to the petitioners mentioning therein that they are members of the gang and involved in serious offences mentioned herein below:

(1) Petitioner: Sachin @ Lakhan Manjabapu Warule (Cr.W.P.No.1409/21)

Sr. No.

Crime No. & Sections

Present status

1

Camp Police Station, Cr. No. 1610/2020, Sections 326, 324, 341, 323, 504, 506, 143, 147, 148, 149, 269, 270, 290 IPC and Section 37(1)(3) of the Maharashtra Police Act.

Pending before the Court RCC No.594/2020

2

Camp Police Station, Cr. No. 1611/2020, Sections 326, 341, 323, 504, 506, 269, 270, 290 read with Section 34 IPC.

Pending before the Court RCC No. 571/2020

3

Camp Police Station Cr. No. 6855/2020, Sections 143, 144, 504, 506 IPC

Under Investigation

(2) Petitioner: Vishal Shaharam Warule (Cr.W.P.No.1410/21)

Sr. No.

Crime No. & Sections

Present status

1

Camp Police Station, Cr. No. 1610/2020, Sections 326, 324, 341, 323, 504, 506, 143, 147, 148, 149, 269, 270, 290 IPC and Section 37(1)(3) of the Maharashtra Police Act.

Pending before the Court RCC No.594/2020

2

Camp Police Station, Cr. No. 1611/2020, Sections 326, 341, 323, 504, 506, 269, 270, 290 read with Section 34 IPC.

Pending before the Court RCC No. 571/2020

3

Camp Police Station 127/2014, Sections 143, 144, 323, 504 read with S.34 IPC

Pending befo

        Click Here to Read the rest of this document
        1
        2
        3
        4
        5
        6
        7
        8
        9
        10
        11
        SupremeToday Portrait Ad
        supreme today icon
        logo-black

        An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

        Please visit our Training & Support
        Center or Contact Us for assistance

        qr

        Scan Me!

        India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

        For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

        whatsapp-icon Back to top