IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD
V. K. Jadhav, Sandipkumar C. More, JJ.
Sachin @ Lakhan s/o Manjabapu Warule – Petitioner
Versus
The State of Maharashtra, through its Principal Secretary, Home Department and ors. – Respondents
Criminal Writ Petition No. 1409, 1410, 1411, 1412 of 2021
Decided On : 30-03-2022
Maharashtra Police Act, 1951 - Section 37(1)(3), 55, 59, 60 – Constitution of India, 1950 - Articles 19 (1) (d) and 21 – Indian Penal Code, 1860 – Section 326, 324, 341, 323, 504, 506, 143, 147, 148, 149, 269, 270, 290 – Punishment for voluntarily causing hurt – Punishment for criminal intimidation – Punishment for rioting - Whether crimes are committed by persons or body of persons acting as a gang.
Findings of court : On going through impugned orders, it appears that authorities below have rightly appreciated entire material on record against petitioners in proper perspective with their subjective satisfaction - Moreover, there is presence of live-link since crimes chosen for externment of persons are of year 2020 and externment proposal also appears to be initiated immediately in year 2020 itself - Considering entire material on record, Court come to conclusion that petitioners are involved in serious criminal activities and they have committed serious crimes jointly as a gang - Moreover, there appears application of mind by externing authority and Respondent No.4 has rightly confirmed orders of externment against petitioners with intention to restrict their criminal activities - Thus, considering aforesaid discussion, Court are of opinion that there is no need to interfere with impugned orders of externment passed against petitioners.
Result : Criminal Writ Petitions are dismissed
JUDGMENT :
Sandipkumar C. More, JJ.
1. Rule. Rule made returnable forthwith and heard finally by consent of learned Counsel for respective parties.
2. The petitioners in Criminal Writ Petitions No. 1409/2021, 1411/2021 and 1412/2021, have prayed for quashing and setting aside order dated 26.10.2021, passed by Respondent No.4 i.e. Divisional Commissioner, Nasik Division, Nasik, in their respective Externment Appeals No.78/2021, 80/2021 and 79/2021, confirming the common order dated 14.07.2021, passed by Respondent No.2 i. e. Superintendent of Police, Ahmednagar, in respect of all these three petitioners, whereby said petitioners are externed from the entire area of Ahmednagar district for the period of 15 months.
The petitioner in Criminal Writ Petition No. 1410/2021 has also challenged the order dated 26.10.2021, passed by Respondent No. 4 – Divisional Commissioner, Nasik Division, Nasik in Externment Appeal No. 103/2021, confirming the order dated 23.08.2021, passed by Respondent No. 2 – Superintendent of Police, Ahmednagar, whereby he is externed from the entire area of Ahmednagar district, for the period of 15 months.
3. Though the numbers of Externment Appeals fled by these petitioners before Respondent No. 4 – Divisional Commissioner, Nasik Division, Nasik, are different, but those appeals are arising out of the impugned orders dated 14.07.2021 and 23.08.2021, respectively, passed by Respondent No.2 – Superintendent of Police, Ahmednagar. Vide order dated 14.07.2021, Respondent No.2 has externed three petitioners in Criminal Writ Petitions No. 1409/2021, 1411/2021 and 1412/2021, from the area of entire Ahmednagar district for the period of 15 months, whereas, the same authority has also externed petitioner – Vishal Shaharam Warule, (petitioner in Criminal Writ Petition No. 1410/2021) vide separate order dated 23.08.2021, from the area of entire Ahmednagar district for the period of 15 months.
4. On perusal of all these petitions along with its annexures, it appears that both the authorities have jointly considered the allegations against all these petitioners, being members of a gang and they have been externed under the provisions of Section 55 of the Maharashtra Police Act, 1951 (herein after referred to as “the said Act”). We, therefore, find it proper to dispose of all these four petitions by a common judgment.
5. The background facts of this case are as under:
On 15.05.2021, Respondent No. 2 – Superintendent of Police, Ahmednagar, had issued a notice under Section 59 of the said Act to the petitioners mentioning therein that they are members of the gang and involved in serious offences mentioned herein below:
(1) Petitioner: Sachin @ Lakhan Manjabapu Warule (Cr.W.P.No.1409/21)
| Sr. No. | Crime No. & Sections | Present status |
| 1 | Camp Police Station, Cr. No. 1610/2020, Sections 326, 324, 341, 323, 504, 506, 143, 147, 148, 149, 269, 270, 290 IPC and Section 37(1)(3) of the Maharashtra Police Act. | Pending before the Court RCC No.594/2020 |
| 2 | Camp Police Station, Cr. No. 1611/2020, Sections 326, 341, 323, 504, 506, 269, 270, 290 read with Section 34 IPC. | Pending before the Court RCC No. 571/2020 |
| 3 | Camp Police Station Cr. No. 6855/2020, Sections 143, 144, 504, 506 IPC | Under Investigation |
(2) Petitioner: Vishal Shaharam Warule (Cr.W.P.No.1410/21)
| Sr. No. | Crime No. & Sections | Present status |
| 1 | Camp Police Station, Cr. No. 1610/2020, Sections 326, 324, 341, 323, 504, 506, 143, 147, 148, 149, 269, 270, 290 IPC and Section 37(1)(3) of the Maharashtra Police Act. | Pending before the Court RCC No.594/2020 |
| 2 | Camp Police Station, Cr. No. 1611/2020, Sections 326, 341, 323, 504, 506, 269, 270, 290 read with Section 34 IPC. | Pending before the Court RCC No. 571/2020 |
| 3 | Camp Police Station 127/2014, Sections 143, 144, 323, 504 read with S.34 IPC | Pending befo |
Ganpat @ Ganesh Tanaji Katare Vs. Assistant Commissioner of Police & others
Namdeo Laxman Charde Vs. Sub- Divisional Magistrate, Katol
Nisar @ Nigro Bashir Ahmed Khan Vs. Deputy. Commissioner of Police & others
Point of Law : Externment order directing externment of a person from much larger area than the one of his illegal activities, can be made, but it should be based upon some material which provides an....
The main legal point established in the judgment is that the application of Section 55 of the Maharashtra Police act requires collective criminal activities of a gang or body of persons, and the acti....
The court upheld the externment orders based on the petitioner's involvement in serious criminal activities as a gang leader and the authorities' proper appreciation of the evidence on record.
Externment orders must be supported by sufficient evidence and cannot infringe on individual liberty without just cause.
The main legal point established in the judgment is the need for careful application of the provisions of the Maharashtra Police act, 1951, and the importance of subjective satisfaction in externment....
The main legal point established in the judgment is the requirement for relevant material and reasonableness in passing an externment order under section 55 of the Maharashtra Police act, 1951, and t....
Externment orders must demonstrate a clear live-link between recent activities and the necessity for such measures.
Externment orders require sufficient evidence and objective material to justify action under the Maharashtra Police Act; lack of such evidence renders the orders illegal.
Externment orders under the Maharashtra Police Act must be supported by objective evidence and cannot infringe upon the fundamental right to free movement without justifiable grounds.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.