Y. G. KHOBRAGADE
Sarhan Bin Ali Alkaseri – Appellant
Versus
State of Maharashtra – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
1. Rule. Rule made returnable forthwith. Heard finally with consent of both the sides.
2. The Petitioner herein takes exception to the order dated 17.05.2024 passed by the Respondent No.2- Superintendent of Police, Nanded under Section 55 of the Maharashtra Police Act and order dated 13.08.2024 passed by the Appellate Authority Respondent No.2- Divisional Commissioner, Chh. Sambhajinagar (Aurangabad) thereby confirming the order of externing the Petitioner from entire Nanded District for a period of six months.
3. Brief facts leading to this petition are that by notice dated 28.12.2023, the Respondent No.4- Sub-Divisional Police Officer, Nanded (City) had conveyed to the petitioner that the Incharge Police Officer of Vimantal Police Station had proposed to extern him (Sarhan Bil Ali Alkaseri) and others i.e. Kamalkishor Ganeshlal Yadav, Gurprit Singh Gulzar Sngh Khaira, Karan Singh Ragbeer Singh Shahu, the members of a gang on the ground that they are operating a gang and their presence in the area is disturbing the peace and tranquility. It is also stated therein that number of offences are registered against the Petitioner and others. Therefore, the Petitioner was served
Ravindra @ Ravi Harisingh Jadhav V/s. State of Maharashtra & Anr.; 2015 (2) Bom.C.R. (Cri.) 813
Deepak Laxman Dongre V/s. State of Maharashtra and Ors.; AIR 2022 SC 1241
Gazi Saduddin V. State of Maharashtra; (2003) 7 SCC 330
N.C.T. of Delhi and Anr. V/s. Sanjeev alias Bittoo; AIR 2005 SC 2080
Rahmat Khan @ Rammu Bismillah V/s. Dy. Commissioner of Police; (2021) 8 SCC 362
Externment orders require sufficient evidence and objective material to justify action under the Maharashtra Police Act; lack of such evidence renders the orders illegal.
Externment orders must be supported by sufficient evidence and cannot infringe on individual liberty without just cause.
Externment orders under the Maharashtra Police Act must be supported by objective evidence and cannot infringe upon the fundamental right to free movement without justifiable grounds.
Externment orders must be based on objective material and specific reasons; failure to consider bail status and due process renders such orders invalid.
The court upheld the externment orders based on the petitioner's involvement in serious criminal activities as a gang leader and the authorities' proper appreciation of the evidence on record.
The main legal point established in the judgment is that the application of Section 55 of the Maharashtra Police act requires collective criminal activities of a gang or body of persons, and the acti....
The main legal point established in the judgment is the requirement for relevant material and reasonableness in passing an externment order under section 55 of the Maharashtra Police act, 1951, and t....
The court upheld the externment under the Maharashtra Police Act but limited its scope to specific talukas, balancing public safety with individual rights.
The main legal point established in the judgment is the need for careful application of the provisions of the Maharashtra Police act, 1951, and the importance of subjective satisfaction in externment....
Externment orders must demonstrate a clear live-link between recent activities and the necessity for such measures.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.