SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2021 Supreme(Bom) 890

DAMA SESHADRI NAIDU, BHARATI DANGRE, M.S.JAWALKAR
Mohd Farhan A Shaikh – Appellant
Versus
Deputy Commissioner Of Income Tax – Respondent


Advocates appeared:
S.R. Rivankar, Advocate, Rama Rivankar, Advocate, Amira Abdul Razaq, Advocate

JUDGMENT

Dama Seshadri Naidu, J. - Introduction:

A learned Division Bench of this Court at Goa has faced a precedential cleavage on an issue. That issue is, does an income tax authority's "mere failure to tick mark the applicable grounds" in the notice issued under Section 271 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 ("IT Act") vitiate the entire penalty proceedings?

2. These decisions, according to the Division Bench, have answered that question in the affirmative-the failure vitiates the notice: (1) The Commissioner of Income-Tax-11 v. Shri Samson Perinchery, TXA No.1154/2014 & Ors. dtd. 05.01.2017; (2) The Principal Commissioner of Income-Tax (Central) Bengaluru v. Goa Coastal Resorts and Recreation Pvt. Ltd., TXA No.24/2019 dtd. 11.11.2019; (3) The Principal Commissioner of Income-Tax, Panaji v. New Era Sova Mind, TXA Nos.70/2019 & Ors. dtd. 18.06.2019 (TXA Nos.70/2019 & Ors, dated 18.6.2019); and (4) The Principal Commissioner of Income-Tax, Panaji v. Goa Dourado Promotions Pvt. Ltd., TXA No.18/2019 dtd. 26.11.2019.

3. On the other hand, an earlier decision by another co-equal bench, according to the referring Division Bench, has taken a contrary view: Commissioner of Income-Tax v. Smt. Kaush

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top