K. R. SHRIRAM, A. S. DOCTOR
Satishkumar Surendra Shetty – Appellant
Versus
District Collector, Thane – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
A.S. DOCTOR, J.
1. The present Writ Petition, impugns:
(ii) two notices dated 27th March, 2017 (“the first impugned notice”) and 9th February, 2021 (“the second impugned notice”) both issued by Respondent No. 4 (Tahsildar/Executive Magistrate, Thane District).
By the impugned order, Respondent No. 2 has directed Respondent No. 4 to take possession inter-alia of flat numbers 201 and 301 in the Harbansh Apartment Building, situated, at Shirvane Village, Nerul, Navi Mumbai, Taluka and District Thane (“the said flats”). By the impugned notices Respondent No. 4 has called upon Petitioner to hand over possession of the said flats failing which Respondent No. 4 would take forcible possession of the same.
A Brief Overview
2. The facts of the present case lie within a very narrow compass. Petitioner claims ownership and possession of the said flats. Conversely Respondent No. 5 claims that the said flats were mortgaged by one Y
Authorized Officer, Indian Bank vs. D. Visalakshi
Commissioner of Income Tax vs. Chhabil Dass Agarwal
Kanaiyalal Sachdev vs. State of Maharashtra and Others
Manoj Kumar Saha vs. Nabadwip Chandra Poddar
Rosy George vs. State Bank of India
State of Haryana vs. Narvir Singh
Standard Chartered Bank vs. V. Noble Kumar
S.P. Chengalvaraya Naidu vs. Jagannath (Dead) by LRs. and Others
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.