Back
S. V. GANGAPURWALA, SANDEEP V. MARNE
Shubham Suresh Bhotmange – Appellant
Versus
Secretary Maharashtra Public Service Commission, Telephone Exchange Bldg, Maharshi Karve Marg, Cooprej, Mumbai – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
(Sandeep V. Marne, J.) :
1. Rule. Rule made returnable forthwith. With consent of parties, taken up for final hearing.
2. By this petition, petitioners assail the Judgment and Order dated 5th January, 2023 passed by the Maharashtra Administrative Tribunal (Tribunal) in Original Application No.1327 of 2022. By that Judgment, the Tribunal has proceeded to dismiss Original Application No.1327 of 2022 instituted by the petitioners seeking a direction that Corrigendum dated 13th December, 2022 is not applicable to selection process initiated in pursuance of advertisement No.05/2020 published on 28th February, 2020.
3. The brief facts of the case, shorn of unnecessary details, are that advertisement No.05/2020 came to be published by the Maharashtra Public Service Commission (Commission) convening the Maharashtra Sub-Ordinate Services Non-Gazetted Group B Preliminary Examination, 2020 (selection), for filling up various posts including the post of Police Sub Inspector (PSI). As per advertisement, the examination was to be conducted in four phases consisting of preliminary examinat
Public Service Commission - Civil service Examination - Public Service Commission have no power to relax the recruitment norms - Public Service Commission have no power to relax the recruitment norms
The main legal point established in the judgment is that altering the marking scheme after the exams were concluded is impermissible and can impact the fairness of the selection process.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
