SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(Bom) 51

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT NAGPUR
A.S. CHANDURKAR, M.W. CHANDWANI, JJ.
Ku. Shimla D/o. Late Satiram Rajbhar & Ors. - Petitioners
Versus
Western Coalfields Limited & Ors. - Respondents
Writ Petition No. 4074 of 2018 With Writ Petition No. 2036 of 2021
Decided On : 20-01-2023

Advocates Appeared:
For the Petitioners: Shri D.S. Thakur.
For the Respondent: Shri A.M. Ghare.

Headnote:

Constitution of India, 1950 – Article 226, 14, 16 ,15 – Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 – Section 2(p), 18(3), 18 – Equal Remuneration Act, 1976 – Section 5 – General Clauses Act, 1897 – Section 13 - Protection of Human Rights Act, 1993 – Section 2(d) – Employee’s Compensation Act, 1923 – Section 2(d) – Gender and number –Claiming Compensation- Equality of opportunity in matters of public employment - No discrimination to be made while recruiting men and women workers - State shall not deny to any person equality before the law or the equal - Petition raising challenge to communication refusing to appoint daughter on compassionate ground – In addition, a declaration is sought that of Chapter – Held, Writ Petition claim of petitioner has not been considered on ground that she cannot be treated as dependent – Similar reason is also contained in impugned communication in Writ Petition as communicated to petitioner – Though in communication rejecting claim of petitioner in Writ Petition seeks to rely upon judgment of Supreme Court, manner as interpreted by Madhya Pradesh High Court in decisions – Court therefore find that in light of such interpretation – Petitioners deserve re-consideration by WCL on their own merits by relying upon – Hence, for aforesaid reasons, impugned communications are set aside – However, applications shall not be rejected on ground that same have been made by a daughter/ married sister of deceased employee – Necessary exercise be completed within a period of six weeks from receipt of copy of judgment – Ordered Accordingly.

JUDGMENT :

A.S. Chandurkar, J.

Since common issues arise in these Writ Petitions, they are being decided together by this common judgment.

2. The facts in Writ Petition No. 4074/2018 are that one Satiram Rajbhar was in employment with the Western Coalfields Limited (WCL) as a permanent non-executive employee. He expired in harness on 6/4/2009 leaving behind his widow. On his death, his daughter Vimla and Shimla along with his brother Nandkishor were eligible dependents who could seek employment on compassionate reasons from the WCL. The widow of Satiram however preferred to seek employment for her son Nandkishor. Since at the relevant time Nandkishor was minor, a request was made by the widow to keep his name on the life roster and pay her monthly monetary compensation till he attained the age of majority and was thereafter provided employment under the National Coal Wage Agreement (NCWA). This was accordingly done. On 3/5/2011, Nandkishor attained majority. After submitting all relevant documents, the WCL on 7/8/2012 provided employment to Nandkishor and stopped paying the amount of monthly monetary compensation to the widow. On completion of the period of probation, the appointment of Nandkishor was regularized from 6/2/2013. Nandkishor however died an unnatural death on 5/6/2015. At that time, the daughter of Satiram as well as the widow were residing with him and were dependent on him. In accordance with the provisions of the NCWA, the widow sought grant of compassionate appointment to her daughter vide communication dated 22/8/2015. The daughter executed an affidavit stating therein that she would take financial and medical care of her mother. On 5/9/2015, the claim for seeking compassionate appointment was rejected by the WCL on the ground that “sister” was not included in the definition of dependent under the NCWA. A representation was thereafter made on 1/6/2018 to which there was no response. In that backdrop, the widow and daughter of Satiram have filed this Writ Petition raising challenge to the communication dated 5/9/2015 refusing to appoint the daughter on compassionate ground. In addition, a declaration is sought that Clause 9.3.3 of Chapter IX of NCWA – IX to the extent it excluded the dependent sister of the deceased from consideration is violative of Articles 14, 15, 16 and 21 of the Constitution of India.

3. The facts in Writ Petition No. 2036/2021 are that the petitioner’s father Shamrao was working as Miscellaneous Majdoor – category – II with the WCL. He died in harness in the year 2010. Thereafter, the petitioner’s brother Yogesh was appointed as General Majdoor – category – I (trainee) on 26/7/2010. He was thereafter made permanent on 26/4/2011. In a road accident, the said Yogesh expired on 17/5/2012. After his death, the petitioner’s mother made a representation to the WCL stating therein that the petitioner – her daughter be given employment on compassionate basis. Since the representation made in that regard was not being decided, Writ Petition No. 3980/2018 was filed by the present petitioner. By the judgment dated 26/11/2019, the WCL was directed to consider the application in question within a period of eight weeks from the date of the order. Pursuant to the said order, the said representation was considered by the WCL and by the order dated 20/1/2020 the same came to be rejected.

Being aggrieved, the petitioner has challenged the aforesaid order of rejection. In addition, a declaration has been sought that the NCWA – IX to the extent it dis-entitles female dependents from seeking employment on compassionate basis was violative of the fundamental rights guaranteed by Part III of the Constitution of India.

4. Shri D.S. Thakur, learned Counsel for the petitioners in Writ Petition No. 4074/2018 submitted that the rejection of the petitioners’ claim to appoint petitioner No.1 on compassionate basis was bad in law. The reason assigned by the WCL that petitioner No.2 as the sister of the deceased was not a d

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top