SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(Bom) 113

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
S.V. Gangapurwala, Sandeep V. Marne, JJ.
Sanjivani Abasaheb Karne and ors. - Petitioners
Versus
The State of Maharashtra Through its Secretary Revenue and Forest Department Mantralaya and ors. – Respondents
Writ Petition No.585 of 2023
Decided On : 30-01-2023

Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Petitioner: Mr. Suvidh Kulkarni a/w Mr. Vishal S. Kadam
For the Respondent: Ms. Nisha Mehra, AGP, Mr. Laxman Deshmukh

Headnote:

Constitution of India, 1950 – Article 226 – Petitioners assail judgment and order passed by Maharashtra Administrative Tribunal, Mumbai in Original Application – Original Application was instituted by Petitioners challenging their non-selection on post communication – Held, Court has upheld cancellation of candidatures on account of making false declaration in online application form about possession of requisite valid non-creamy layer certificate – Special Leave Petition filed by Petitioners has been dismissed by Court by its order – In our opinion, therefore, Tribunal has already followed law expanded by this Court to which one of us was member – Court are of considered view that no error is committed by Tribunal in dismissing Original Application filed by Petitioners – Discharged accordingly.

JUDGMENT :

Sandeep V. Marne, J.

1. Rule. Rule made returnable forthwith with consent of the parties and is taken up for final hearing.

2. By this Petition, Petitioners assail judgment and order dated 9 January 2023 passed by the Maharashtra Administrative Tribunal, Mumbai (hereinafter referred to as “Tribunal” for short) in Original Application No.701 of 2022. The Original Application was instituted by the Petitioners challenging their non-selection on the post of Talathi vide communication dated 27 May 2021.

3. The selection was convened by the District Selection Board and Collector, Satara, for filling of 114 posts of Talathi. The Petitioners applied in pursuance of the selection under various following categories:

Sr. No.

Name of Petitioners

Applied in Category

1

Petitioner No.1 Sanjivani Abasaheb Karne

OBC

2

Petitioner No. 2 Shubhangi Madhukar Misal

OBC

3

Petitioner No. 3 Narale Dattatray Nana

Ex-serviceman OBC

4

Petitioner No. 4 Akshay Sudam Lohar

NT-B (General)

5

Petitioner No. 5 Pooja Vijay Narvekar

Female (General)

6

Petitioner No. 6 Chhaya Subhash Badiger

Female OBC (Anshkalin)

4. Under the stipulations of the advertisement, it was incumbent for the candidates applying for reservation in above categories to produce non-creamy layer certificate for the year 2018-19 valid up to 31 March 2019. All Petitioners stated ‘applicable’ in the column seeking information about ‘non-creamy layer certificate’. The advertisement stipulated possession of valid non-creamy layer certificate as on date filling of online application form. It is common ground that none of the Petitioners were in possession of the requisite non-creamy layer certificates and applied the same after filling of the online application forms and the same were issued well after filling of the online application forms.

5. The Petitioners however were permitted to participate in the selection process. They apparently cleared the written test and their names were allegedly included in the original selection list. By letter dated 28 December 2020, they were directed to remain present for verification of their documents scheduled to be conducted from 6 January 2021 to 9 January 2021. It is contended that communications dated 19 January 2021 was sent to each of the Petitioners alleging non-submission of non-creamy layer certificate valid up on 31 March 2019. They were granted an opportunity to submit the same by 27 January 2021. However, on account of failure of the Petitioners to submit non-creamy layer certificate valid upto 31 March 2019, the candidatures were cancelled vide order dated 27 May 2021.

6. Aggrieved by the communication dated 27 May 2021, Petitioners instituted Original Application No.701 of 2022 before the Tribunal which came to be dismissed by judgment and order dated 9 January 2023. Aggrieved by the decision of the Tribunal, the Petitioners have filed present Petition.

7. Appearing for the Petitioner Mr. Kulkarni, the learned Counsel would submit that there is no dispute to the position that the Petitioners do belong to non-creamy layer category. He would submit that as long as the Petitioners’ status as non-creamy layer category is not under dispute, Respondents cannot be permitted to take a hyper-technical defence and reject candidature of the Petitioners only on account of non-possession of the requisite certificates at the time of filling up of online application forms. It is submitted that in the past as well as in several other districts, candidates were permitted to submit non-creamy layer certificates subsequently and such candidates have been appointed in service. Reliance is placed on recruitment advertisement published by Maharashtra Public Service Commission (in short ‘MPSC’) in respect of some other posts for which candidates are permitted to submit non-creamy layer c

    Click Here to Read the rest of this document
    1
    2
    3
    4
    5
    6
    7
    8
    9
    10
    11
    SupremeToday Portrait Ad
    supreme today icon
    logo-black

    An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

    Please visit our Training & Support
    Center or Contact Us for assistance

    qr

    Scan Me!

    India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

    For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

    whatsapp-icon Back to top