SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2021 Supreme(Pat) 295

MOHIT KUMAR SHAH
Mahtab Ahmad Mallick – Appellant
Versus
State Of Bihar – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
Mr. Brisketu Sharan Pandey, Adv., for the Appellant; Mr. Sanjay Pandey, Adv., for the Respondent.

JUDGMENT

1. The present writ petition has been filed for directing the respondents no. 4 to 6 to modify the final result published on 01.10.2018 to the extent that the result of the petitioner, which has been cancelled, be declared and upon declaration of such result, if the petitioner is found successful / qualified in the final selection process, appropriate action be initiated by the respondents to appoint the petitioner.

2. The brief facts of the case, according to the petitioner, are that he belongs to non-creamy layer category under the backward caste. The petitioner had applied for selection on the post of Accounts Officer in pursuance to advertisement no. 03 of 2015, published by the Bihar Public Service Commission (hereinafter referred to as 'the BPSC), whereafter admit card was issued to the petitioner for appearing in the prelims examination, which was conducted on 25.09.20216, whereupon the result was published on 10.03.2017 and the petitioner was declared to be successful. The petitioner had then appeared in the mains examination, which was held in between 11.12.2017 to 16.12.2017. Altogether 206 candidates were declared successful including the petitioner and the result

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top