Back
DHIRAJ SINGH THAKUR, ABHAY AHUJA
Punia Capital Pvt. Ltd – Appellant
Versus
Assistant Commissioner Of Income Tax – Respondent
JUDGMENT
Dhiraj Singh Thakur, J. - The Petitioner challenges the validity of the notice issued under Section 148 of the Income-tax Act, 1961 ('Act'), as also the proceedings for reopening of assessment under Section 147 of the Act.
2 Briefly stated the material facts are as under :
The Petitioner fled a return of income under Section 139 of the of the Act for the assessment year 2015-16. The case was selected for scrutiny under Computer Assisted Scrutiny Selection ('CASS'). The assessing offcer issued a notice under Section 142(1) of the Act calling for various details mentioned therein. The Petitioner states that pursuant to the said notice, it submitted its fnancial statements for the year ending 31 March 2015. The assessment proceedings were completed under Section 143(3) on 31 August 2017 accepting the loss at Rs.(-) 4,23,213/- declared in the return of income.
3 A notice under Section 148 of the Act dated 31 March 2021 was issued by the assessing offcer seeking to reopen the Petitioner's assessment for assessment year 2015-16 on the ground that the assessing offcer had reason to believe that income for that year had escaped assessment within the meaning of Section 147 of the Act.
The main legal point established in the judgment is the requirement for clear and unambiguous reasons based on 'reason to believe' for reopening an assessment under Section 147 of the Income-tax Act,....
The Assessing Officer's jurisdiction under section 147 of the Act has to be tested on the basis of the reasons recorded, and the reassessment proceedings cannot be based on a mere change of opinion w....
The Assessing Officer must establish the jurisdictional requirement for reopening and cannot rely solely on information without verifying if the issue had been disclosed during the original assessmen....
The court established that reopening assessments requires a clear and valid reason to believe that income has escaped assessment, which was not present in this case.
Reopening of assessment under Section 148 requires clear, independent reasoning demonstrating income has escaped assessment, which was not satisfied in this case.
The court emphasized the need for tangible material to believe that income had escaped assessment and held that the power to grant approval for re-opening an assessment is coupled with a duty and can....
The judgment established the importance of tangible material and the prohibition of a mere change of opinion in the exercise of power under section 147 of the Income Tax Act.
Under section 147 of the Act the proceedings for the reassessment can be initiated only if the Assessing Officer has reason to believe that any income chargeable to tax has escaped assessment for any....
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
