REVATI MOHITE DERE, SHARMILA U. DESHMUKH
Vishal @ Sagar Haribhau Nanaware @ Gurav – Appellant
Versus
State of Maharashtra – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
Sharmila U. Deshmukh, J.
1. Since, both the aforesaid appeals arise out of a common judgment and order and hence are taken up for hearing together and are being disposed of by this common judgment.
2. By these appeals, the appellants challenge the impugned judgment and order dated 31st December 2012 passed by the Additional Sessions Judge, Satara in Sessions Case No.71 of 2012. By the impugned judgment and order, the appellants were convicted and sentenced as under :
3. The case of the prosecution, as gathered from the material placed on record is that on 12th March, 2012 at about 7.45 a.m., the deceased – Shantaram was sitting on the “lap” (katta) of Anganwadi. At that time, accused no.1–Vishal @ Sagar Haribhau Nanaware @ Gurav, and accused No.2–Pravin @ Sonya Sanjay Algude came to the spot by motorcycle; the motorcycle being driven by accused no.2; that the accus
Ganesh Bhavan Patel v. State of Maharashtra [(1978) 4 SCC 371]
Hem Raj v. Raja Ram [(2004) 9 SCC 18];
Jainul Haque v. State of Bihar [(1974) 3 SCC 543];
Jalpat Rai v. State of Haryana [(2011) 14 SCC 208]
Podda Narayana Vs. State of Andhra Pradesh [AIR 1975 SC 1252]
Ram Bihari Yadav v. State of Bihar and Ors. (1998) 4 SCC 517
Suresh Rai Vs. State of Bihar AIR 2000 SC 2207
Sheo Shankar Singh v. State of Jharkand & Ors (2011) 3 SCC 654
Sambhu Das v. State of Assam [AIR 2010 SC 3300]
Balwantbhai B Patel v. State of Gujarat [(2009) 10 SCC 684];
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.