SUNIL B. SHUKRE, G. A. SANAP
Prashant S/o Vinayak Thakare – Appellant
Versus
Honourable Chancellor, Amravati University (his Excellency – Respondent
JUDGMENT
G.A.Sanap, J. - In this petition, the petitioner is seeking writ of certiorari to quash and set aside the order dated 10.07.2000, passed by the respondent no.1 - Hon'ble Chancellor, Amravati University, Amravati directing respondent no.2 - Vice Chancellor, Amravati University, Amravati to terminate the appointment of the petitioner as a Lecturer in Molecular Biology in the Department of Bio Technology of Amravati University and other consequential reliefs.
2. This Court (Coram : D.K. Deshmukh and S.K.Shah, JJ), on 01.08.2000, issued Rule in the matter with a direction to the parties to maintain status-quo vis-a-vis employment of the petitioner. On 22.04.2022, the petition was heard by this Court (Coram : Nitin Jamdar and Anil L. Pansare, JJ.) and passed a detailed order. The Court dealt with the submissions advanced by the learned advocates for the parties and made certain observations in the order. This Court directed the concerned to place the matter before the Hon'ble Chancellor for further course of action. This Court in view of the candid observations made in the order, dated 22.04.2022 made a request to the Hon'ble Chancellor to have a relook at the impugned order and
University Grants Commission and others .vs. Sadhana Chaudhary and others
Union of India and another .vs. Ravi Shankar and another
C. V. Rajendran and another .vs. N. M. Muhammed Kunhi
Rakesh Bakshi and another .vs. State of Jammu and Kashmir and others
State of Haryana and others .vs. Anurag Shrivatava and another
Pramod Kumar .vs. U.P. Secondary Education Services Commission and others
Judgment affirms the necessity of due process in employment, emphasizing that failure to provide a hearing before termination violates natural justice. UGC regulations' retrospective application prot....
The Selection Committee cannot alter the essential qualifications for a position once the selection process has commenced, and the Chancellor has the authority to terminate appointments that do not c....
It is in interest of University that all doubts regarding appointment of teachers are raised within a period of three months to have an early decision by Chancellor to give quietus to disputes in Uni....
The continuous advertisement of a reserved post for a specified period without a response from reserved category candidates entitles the appointed candidate to de-reservation and service benefits as ....
Qualifications for lecturer appointments must be met at the time of appointment, and later-acquired qualifications do not retroactively qualify an individual.
The principles of natural justice necessitate a hearing prior to adverse administrative decisions impacting employment continuity, particularly when previous performance has been approved.
Point of Law : Probation appointment - Appointment of the petitioner was not made on the said post of lecturer after following the requisite procedure under Statute 417 framed by the University.
Appointment – Parameters to be applied to a case where an incumbent to a post does not fulfil qualifications prescribed for a post, are different from parameters to be applied to a case where no spec....
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.