SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2022 Supreme(Bom) 1986

ROHIT B. DEO, URMILA JOSHI-PHALKE
Radheshyam – Appellant
Versus
State of Maharashtra – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
S.G.Joshi, Advocate, T.A.Mirza, Advocate

JUDGMENT

Urmila Joshi-Phalke, J. - By this appeal, the appellant challenges judgment and order dated 16.3.2018 passed by learned Additional Sessions Judge-4, Nagpur in Sessions Trial No.433/2015 whereby he is convicted for offence punishable under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code and sentenced him to suffer imprisonment for life and to pay fine Rs.500/- and in default of payment of the fine amount to suffer rigorous imprisonment for two months. The appellant is also given set-off under Section 428 of the Indian Penal Code since he was in jail.

2. Heard learned counsel Shri S.G.Joshi appointed for the appellant and learned Additional Public Prosecutor Shri T.A.Mirza for the State.

3. The material on the case of the prosecution unfolds as under:

on 22.4.2015, informant Ganesh Manu Kodwate had lodged report at Deolapur Police Station, district Nagpur contending that he is serving in Defence as Constable and posted at Arunachal Pradesh. His family members i.e. wife, mother, deceased brother Manoj and wife of Manoj are staying at Junewani. On 14.4.2015, he came to Junewani on leave

      Click Here to Read the rest of this document
      1
      2
      3
      4
      5
      6
      7
      8
      9
      10
      11
      SupremeToday Portrait Ad
      supreme today icon
      logo-black

      An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

      Please visit our Training & Support
      Center or Contact Us for assistance

      qr

      Scan Me!

      India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

      For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

      whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
      whatsapp-icon Back to top