Devidas VS State of Maharashtra

Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation

VIBHA KANKANWADI
Devidas – Appellant
Versus
State of Maharashtra – Respondent

Advocates Appeared:
Mr. C. C. Deshpande, for the Appellant; Mr. A. M. Phule, for the Respondent.

ORDER

1. The applicant is apprehending his arrest in connection with Crime No.900 of 2021, registered with Shahada Police Station, District Nandurbar, for the offence punishable under Section 420 read with 34 of the IPC.

2. Heard learned Advocate Mr. C. C. Deshpande for applicant and learned APP Mr. A. M. Phule for respondent-State.

3. It has been vehemently submitted on behalf of the applicant that applicant was the president of one Adivasi-Pardhi Sanskrutik Va Shaikshanik Mandal, Shahada. An advertisement for the post of teacher was published. The informant states that he is B.A. B.Ed. (Geography) and D.Ed. That advertisement was published in 2015. Thereafter, informant's father-in-law had met applicant. Applicant had demanded amount of Rs.15,00,000/- for giving the job to the informant. He says that Rs.7,00,000/- was given immediately, and thereafter, appointment letter was issued to the informant on 20-06-2015. After some days, when the applicant demanded the remaining amount of Rs.8,00,000/-, the informant's father-in-law sold his plot and gave that amount. Informant worked with the said institution from 2015 to 2019. Thereafter, when he demanded that his job should be regulariz

Click Here to Read the rest of this document