M. S. SONAK, M. S. JAWALKAR
Shukr Sudin Sinai Usgaonkar S/o Sudin M. S. Usgaonkar – Appellant
Versus
State of Goa, through the Chief Secretary – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
M.S. JAWALKAR, J.
1. Heard learned Counsel for the parties.
2. Rule. Rule made returnable forthwith with the consent and at the request of the petitioner appearing in person and learned Advocate General. Learned Additional Government Advocate waives service on behalf of the respondent.
3. Petitioner, who appeared in person, seeks to challenge in this Writ Petition the constitutional validity of Section 13D(e) and 13G read with Section 2(7) and 2(8) of the Goa Public Gambling Act, 1976 (for the sake of brevity ‘the Act’).
4. It is submitted by the petitioner that Section 13A was inserted by way of amendment dated 24.08.1992, thereby empowering the government to permit the conduct of any game of electronic amusement or slot machine in Five Star Hotels. The said Act was further amended on 11.09.1996 and a further clause to Section 13A of the Act was added thereby empowering the government to permit the conduct of such table games and gaming on board in vessels offshore as may be notified. Section 2(A) was added by way of amendment and “Gaming Commissioner” was defined. “Tourist” and “Tourist permit” are defined under Section 2(7) and Section 2(8), respectively. The said Act was
Budhan Chaudhary vs. State of Bihar
B.R. Enterprises vs. State of U.P. and Others
Big Way Bar and Restaurant vs. Commissioner of Police
Deepak Sibal vs. Punjab University
Dr. Pradeep Jain vs. Union of India
Khoday Distilleries vs. State of Karnataka
Harshendra Choubisa vs. State of Rajasthan
Kailash Chand Sharma vs. State of Rajasthan
Lalit Sehgal vs. State of Goa and Others
Lakshman vs. State of Madhya Pradesh
Meher Distilleries vs. State of Maharashtra
Nagpur Improvement Trust vs. Vithal Rao
State of Maharashtra vs. Indian Hotel and Restaurant Association
State of Bombay vs. R.M.D. Chamarbaugwala and Another
State executive action, though purportedly exercised under local government powers, is invalid if its substance and effect constitute a blanket prohibition on a federally regulated activity. Courts m....
Amendment extending gaming authorisation to Union Territory required unissued Central Government commencement notification; thus inoperative despite rules and representations. Promissory estoppel ina....
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.