SANDEEP V. MARNE
Arvind Balaji Walvekar – Appellant
Versus
State of Maharashtra Through the Hon’ble Minister Revenue Department – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. disputes over land regrant and jurisdiction issues arise. (Para 1 , 7 , 8) |
| 2. historical ownership and lease agreements provide context. (Para 2 , 3 , 4 , 6 , 20) |
| 3. challenges to land regrant under specific legislative framework. (Para 5) |
| 4. claims of jurisdiction effects on revenue authority actions. (Para 10 , 11 , 12) |
| 5. arguments reflect conflicts over land classification and ownership. (Para 14 , 15) |
| 6. legal definitions of 'watan' impact claims and actions. (Para 18 , 19) |
| 7. issues of regrant hinge on civil court determinations. (Para 26 , 36) |
| 8. determination of land status affects regrant entitlement. (Para 27 , 28) |
| 9. revenue authorities must respect civil court findings. (Para 30 , 31 , 32) |
| 10. court invalidates previous regrant decisions. (Para 38) |
| 11. orders of relevant authorities set aside pending appeal outcome. (Para 39) |
JUDGMENT :
1. By this petition, Petitioner has challenged the Order dated 25 August 2009 passed by the Minister-Revenue rejecting his Revision Application and confirming the Order dated 16 July 2009 passed by the Additional Commissioner, Pune who in turn, had confirmed the Order dated 23 April 2001 of Tehsildar, by which the land in question
Gangabai Ramrao Patil vs. State of Maharashtra and Others 2019 (6) Mh.L.J. 896
Gopinath s/o. Ganpatrao Pensalwar Vs. State of Maharashtra and another 2007 (1) Mh.L.J. 819
ITI Ltd. Vs. Siemens Public Communications Network Ltd. (2002) 5 SCC 510
Jehal Tanti and Others Vs. Nageshwar Singh (Dead) Through LRs. (2013) 14 scc 689
Keshrimal Jivji Shah and another Vs. Bank of Maharashtra and others 2004 (3) Mh.L.J. 893
Kunhayammed and Others Vs. State of Kerela and Another (2000) 6 SCC 359
Sayed Mohomed Baquir El-Edroos (Dead) by LRs. Vs. State of Gujarat (1981) 4 SCC 383
The existence of a binding Civil Court decree on land ownership prohibits revenue authorities from ordering regrant under the Watan Abolition Act, pending resolution of appeals regarding land classif....
The decree of the Civil Court declaring land as non-Watan is binding on revenue authorities, and regrant under the Maharashtra Pargana and Kulkarni Watans (Abolition) Act, 1950 is invalid if the land....
The central legal point established in the judgment is that the Maharashtra Inferior Village Watans Abolition Act, 1959 does not permit repeated regrants of watan land once regranted to an authorized....
The main legal point established in the judgment is that the provisions of Section 9 of the Maharashtra Inferior Village Watans Abolition Act, 1959 are inapplicable when the land has already been reg....
A land sale finalized under old tenure is valid without needing permission, and re-opening resolved disputes requires substantial justification; delay affects maintainability of claims.
Civil Law - Revenue Board - Jurisdiction - It is definitely within domain of revenue authorities to take a final decision on issue as to whether lands in question are Government lands and if so, whet....
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.