Back
SANDEEP V. MARNE
Ganesh Industries, through its proprietary – Appellant
Versus
Workers of Ganesh Industries Through Sarva Mazdoor Sangh C/o Pravin Nadkar – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
1. Rule. Rule is made returnable forthwith. With the consent of the learned counsel for the parties, the Petition is taken up for final disposal.
2. This petition is filed by the Employer-Ganesh Industries challenging the Award dated 11 June 2019 as corrected by further Order dated 12 November 2020 passed by the Industrial Court, Mumbai. By the impugned Award, the Industrial Court has partly allowed the Reference and has decided various demand (total 21 in number) raised by the Respondent-Union relating to rise in basic Wages, Dearness Allowance, Categorization of various Allowance (House Rent, Leave Travel, Education, City Conveyance, Washing, Medical and Lunch), Attendance bonus and Bonus, Festival Advance, Leave Facility, Uniform Facility and Shift Arrangement. It must be observed at the very outset that though total 15 demands of the Respondent-Union have been adjudicated by the Industrial Court, the Petitioner has restricted the challenge in this petition to the adjudication of demands pertaining to Ad-hoc rise in basic Wages and Education Allowance. A statement made on behalf of the Petitioner in this regard has been recorded by this Court during the course of hearin
The principle of 'equal work for equal pay' was upheld, with the court modifying the effective date of wage benefits to 01.01.2012.
The Tribunal must conduct a thorough evidentiary analysis to justify decisions concerning wage revisions and additional allowances under the Industrial Disputes Act, ensuring all material evidence is....
The main legal point established in the judgment is that the employer is obligated to pay the minimum wages at the revised rate, as it would partially reduce the impact of the increase in the cost of....
Employees must actively pursue reinstatement post-award; however, employers' refusal to act can diminish employees' obligations to report for work.
Temporary employees' termination post-ULP complaint illegal sans compliance; reinstatement upheld sans permanency; backwages limited to 50% pendency, arrears 90 days pre-filing; entitled to minimum p....
An award under the Industrial Disputes Act becomes unenforceable if the employee fails to comply with its terms, and the Assistant Labour Commissioner cannot adjudicate claims for higher wages withou....
Workmen are not entitled to wages during an illegal strike; minimum wage must reflect parity with similar undertakings while considering existing agreements.
The authority's order under Section 33-C(1) was valid as the employer failed to dispute the existence of a relevant settlement, maintaining wage parity between contractual and regular employees in li....
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
