JUDGMENT :

Devendra Kumar Upadhyaya, J.

1. Heard the petitioner in-person and Dr. Sharma, learned counsel representing the respondent and perused the records available before us on this writ petition.

CHALLENGE: -

2. By instituting the proceedings of this petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, the petitioner takes exception to the judgment and order dated 1st August 2013 passed by the Mumbai Bench of the Central Administrative Tribunal (hereafter referred to as “the CAT”), whereby Original Application No. 98 of 2011 filed by the petitioner has been dismissed.

3. The petitioner sought review of the impugned judgment and order dated 1st August 2013, which too stands dismissed by the CAT by means of the order dated 22nd August 2014. This order passed by the CAT is also under challenge in this writ petition.

4. The order dated 4th September 1995 passed by the Government of India, Ministry of External Affairs, whereby the rate of Foreign Allowance admissible to employees working on deputation in Indian Technical and Economic Cooperation Programme (ITEC), Maldives was revised and it was decided that such deputationists shall be paid a sum of Rs. 40,845/- if they were drawing