IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
ANIL K.NARENDRAN, MURALEE KRISHNA S.
Prabhakaran Nair V.R. – Appellant
Versus
Mahatma Gandhi University – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. dispute over qualifications for associate professor position (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. respondent's counter arguments against qualifications claimed (Para 3 , 4 , 5) |
| 3. court's analysis on procedural adherence in pleadings (Para 6 , 11 , 12) |
| 4. appellant's contention regarding publications and qualifications (Para 8 , 9 , 10) |
| 5. judgment analysis confirming decision of selection committee (Para 21) |
| 6. final decision to dismiss the writ appeal (Para 22) |
JUDGMENT :
The petitioner in W.P.(C)No.25594 of 2018 filed this writ appeal under Section 5 (i) of the Kerala High Court Act, 1958, challenging the judgment dated 19.03.2021 passed by the learned Single Judge in that writ petition.
2.1. As per Ext.P2 notification dated 16.12.2017, the University had advertised for the selection of the post of Associate Professor (one post in the open category) in the School of Social Sciences. The appellant, as well as the 4th respondent, applied for the post, claiming that both of them have the required qualification. As per general condition No.1 stipulated in the notification, the appointments against the vacancies notified by Ext.P2 will be made as per UGC norms and reservation principles in acc
Pradeep Singh Dehal v. State of Himachal Pradesh
The court upheld the Selection Committee's decision insisting that qualifications for academic posts must be evaluated by experts, and judicial interference is warranted only under extreme circumstan....
Employment and Service matter - Appointment as an Associate Professor in the School of Social Sciences of the Mahatma Gandhi University - Selection committee – Qualiification - Absence of post doctor....
The central legal point established in the judgment is the interpretation and application of the UGC Regulation, 2018, particularly regarding the eligibility criteria for the post of Associate Profes....
The court affirmed the validity of the selection process for Assistant Professors and clarified that guest lecturer experience can't always be excluded for direct recruitment under regulatory guideli....
The Selection Committee cannot alter the essential qualifications for a position once the selection process has commenced, and the Chancellor has the authority to terminate appointments that do not c....
Grant of marks under head ‘Publications’ becomes vital because, even if she is to be granted full marks for ‘UGC Scholarship’ in absence of at least five more marks, she will not be able to obtain an....
The main legal point established in the judgment is that the appointment of an Associate Professor must comply with the qualifications prescribed by the relevant statutes and regulations, and the app....
The court established that a Ph.D. is not a mandatory qualification for the Assistant Professor position, affirming that candidates with a Master's degree and NET qualification are equally eligible.
Relaxation in age does not in any manner upset “level playing field”. It is not possible to accept submission of learned counsel for appellants that relaxation in age or concession in fee would in an....
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.