MILIND N. JADHAV
Atlanta Limited – Appellant
Versus
Anil R. Agarwal – Respondent
JUDGMENT
1. Heard Mr. Vashi, learned Senior Advocate for Applicants in Interim Applications and for Plaintiff in Suit; Mr. Madon, learned Senior Advocate for Respondent Nos. 1(a) to 1(c) in IA/589/2019 and for proposed Defendant No. 29 in IA/2761/2022 and Ms. Bhiungade, learned Advocate for proposed Defendant Nos.11(a) to 11(d), 14(a) to 14(f) and 22(a) to 22(b).
2. Interim Application No. 589 of 2019 and Interim Application (L) No. 36100 of 2022 are decided by this judgement. Original Suit is Suit No. 175 of 2013. Both Interim Applications are filed in the said Suit proceedings.
3. Interim Application No. 589 of 2019 is filed by the original Plaintiff Atlanta Ltd for amendment to the original Suit proceedings and deletion of the name of the Defendant Nos. 1, 11, 14 and 22 on account of their demise in the interregnum and to bring their legal heirs and legal representatives on record of the suit proceedings. This Interim Application is strongly opposed to on various grounds, which shall be adverted to later, by the proposed legal heirs of original Defendant No. 1 viz. proposed Defendant No. 1(a), 1(b) and 1(c). They are represented by Mr. Madon, learned Senior Advocate. In so far as t
Ram Nath Sao alias Ram Nath Sahu & Ors. Vs. Gobardhan Sao & Ors.
S.P. Chengalvaraya Naidu Vs. Jagannath
Balwant Singh Vs. Jagdish Singh
N. Balakrishnan v. M. Krishnamurthy
Rama Ravalu Gavade v. Sataba Gavadu
State of W.B. v. Administrator, Howrah Municipality
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.