Back
B. P. COLABAWALLA, M. M. SATHAYE
Rajeev Ruia – Appellant
Versus
Mahesh Vennalakanti – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. overview of the judicial separation and divorce context (Para 1 , 2 , 3) |
| 2. details of property ownership and purchase (Para 4 , 5 , 6) |
| 3. claims made regarding the shared ownership of property (Para 10 , 12 , 13) |
| 4. application of benami transactions act (Para 14 , 16) |
| 5. discussion of evidence and argument on property ownership (Para 18 , 20) |
| 6. ownership disputes hinge on who provided the purchase consideration. (Para 22 , 25 , 30) |
| 7. examination of section 14 of the hindu succession act (Para 37 , 38 , 39) |
| 8. reliance on provisions must be backed by established ownership claims. (Para 41 , 46) |
| 9. conclusions regarding limitation act applicability (Para 51 , 54) |
| 10. court's final ruling and order on the appeal (Para 56 , 60) |
JUDGMENT
B.P. Colabawalla, J. -The above Family Court Appeal impugns the Judgment and Decree dated 11th March 2013 passed by the Family Court at Bandra. By the impugned Judgment, the Family Court has:
(b) decreed the Respondent's counterclaim for divorce under
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
