IN THE HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY
B. P. Colabawalla, Somasekhar Sundaresan, JJ.
Symbiosis Open Education Society And Symbiosis Skills And Professional University & Anr. - Appellants
Versus
University Grants Commission & Ors. - Respondents
Writ Petition No. 7339 of 2023
Decided On : 28-06-2024
CONSTITUTIONAL VALIDITY - UNIVERSITY GRANTS COMMISSION REGULATIONS - UGC Act, 1956; Distance Learning Regulations, 2020 - The court upheld the constitutional validity of the Distance Learning Regulations, emphasizing the necessity of accreditation and proven track record for Higher Educational Institutions (HEIs) to offer programs through Open and Distance Learning (ODL) and Online (OL) modes. The court interpreted the regulations as a means to ensure quality education, arguing that the stipulations were not arbitrary but rather a rational policy choice aimed at maintaining educational standards. The court acknowledged the ongoing issues with the accreditation process for skill universities and directed the UGC to consider exemptions for such institutions while ensuring compliance with other regulatory requirements.
Fact of the Case:
The Writ Petition challenged the constitutional validity of certain provisions in the University Grants Commission (Open and Distance Learning Programmes and Online Programmes) Regulations, 2020, which imposed accreditation requirements on Higher Educational Institutions (HEIs) wishing to offer programs through ODL and OL modes. The petitioners, representing a skill university, argued that these requirements were arbitrary and unsuitable for skill-based programs.
Finding of the Court:
The court found that the provisions under challenge were not manifestly arbitrary or unreasonable. It upheld the necessity of accreditation and a proven track record for HEIs to ensure quality in ODL and OL programs. The court recognized the inadequacy of the current accreditation process for skill universities but maintained that the regulations themselves were constitutionally valid.
Issues: The primary issues included whether the accreditation requirements imposed by the Distance Learning Regulations were arbitrary and whether they unfairly discriminated against skill universities in their ability to offer ODL and OL programs.
Ratio Decidendi: The court held that the stipulations for accreditation and proven track record were rational policy choices aimed at ensuring quality education. It emphasized that while the regulations were valid, the application of the accreditation process needed to be appropriate for different types of universities, particularly skill universities.
Final Decision: The court ruled in favor of the UGC's regulations but directed that the UGC should consider granting exemptions to skill universities from strict compliance with the NAAC accreditation requirement, pending the development of a more suitable accreditation process for such institutions.
JUDGEMENT
Somasekhar Sundaresan, J. - Rule. By consent of parties, Rule is made returnable forthwith, and taken up for hearing and final disposal.
Introduction and Context:
2. The challenge in this Writ Petition is to the constitutional validity of four provisions contained in the University Grants Commission (Open and Distance Learning Programmes and Online Programmes) Regulations, 2020 ('Distance Learning Regulations'), subordinate law made under the University Grants Commission Act, 1956 ('UGC Act').
3. The provisions under challenge stipulate two entry barriers for offering undergraduate and postgraduate programmes (collectively, 'programmes') through the 'open and distance learning' ('ODL') mode and the 'online' ('OL') mode. First, any 'Higher Educational Institution' ('HEI')[Defined in Regulation 2(n) of the Distance Learning Regulations, to mean universities and deemed universities under the UGC Act.] must meet a certain basic accreditation score or ranking as a condition precedent for offering programmes through the ODL and OL modes. Second, the programme proposed to be offered through the ODL or OL mode should also be on offer in the 'conventional mode'[Defined in Regulation 2(f) of he Distance Learning Regulations] i.e. through face-to-face interaction between the teacher and the learner in the regular classroom environment, and one batch should have passed out from such programme.
4. Symbiosis Open Education Society ('SOES') is the 'sponsoring body'[Defined in Section 2(xxii) of the SSPU Act] of the Symbiosis Skills and Professional University ('SSPU'), under the Symbiosis Skills and Professional University Act, 2017 ('SSPU Act'), a State legislation. Under this law, SSPU is meant to be self-financed (without funding from the Government of Maharashtra). However, in respect of academic standards, SSPU is required to comply with norms and conditions stipulated by 'regulatory bodies'[Defined in Section 2(xix) of the SSPU Act] which brings the University Grants Commission ('UGC'), the author of the Distance Learning Regulations, into the picture.
5. SSPU is a 'skill university'[A 'skill university' is understood to be a HEI that offers programmes that are specifically skill-based, job-oriented and of an applied nature. Skill universities offer programmes that have a higher job potential and employability in the market. The degrees they award need to conform to the National Skills Qualification Framework, authored by Respondent No. 3], with a focus on offering programmes focused on skill development and employment. For instance, a Bachelors of Business Administration programme, an undergraduate degree could have a focus on retail marketing or on ports and container terminals. Such programmes are meant to provide a focus on development of employable skills, and are currently being offered in the conventional mode. SSPU is desirous of offering some of these programmes through the ODL mode.
However, SSPU is unable to meet the accreditation norms stipulated in the Distance Learning Regulations, which is the underlying reason for the challenge in this Writ Petition.
6. According to the Petitioners, the requirement for accreditation or ranking is per se arbitrary and unreasonable. That apart, according to the Petitioners, such a requirement should not apply to skill universities, because the parameters by which traditional HEIs are currently being accredited do not lend themselves as a fair means for assessing skill development programmes appropriately. The Petitioners are also challenging the requirement to offer the same programmes in the conventional mode, with one batch having passed out. The Petitioners submit that the UGC itself has resolved to remove the requirement of one batch passing out, but the formal amendment of the Distance Learning Regulations has not yet been carried out.
7. The Distance Learning Regulations are a self-contained regulatory framework to govern the provision of ODL and OL programmes by HEIs. Under Regula
AI
The court established that while the accreditation requirements for HEIs under the Distance Learning Regulations are constitutionally valid, the application of these requirements must be appropriate ....
The classification of Higher Educational Institutions (HEIs) on the basis of whether they had applied to the National Assessment and Accreditation Council (NAAC) on or before 29.02.2020 was reasonabl....
Degrees from open universities not adhering to UGC regulations are invalid for public employment and promotion.
Point of Law : Rejection of the requests for granting recognition without providing adequate opportunity to the respondent university is violation of principles of natural justice.
Point of Law : The powers under Article 142(1) to do complete justice is entirely of different level or of a different quality. Any prohibition or restriction contained in ordinary laws cannot act as....
Deemed universities must comply with UGC guidelines for distance education; degrees awarded without prior approval are invalid.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.