Back
VIBHA KANKANWADI, MRS. VRUSHALI V. JOSHI
Yogesh Udaram Gokhe – Appellant
Versus
State of Maharashtra, through its Principal Secretary, Ministry of Home Affairs – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. challenge to detention order based on alleged offenses. (Para 3 , 9) |
| 2. arguments on lack of reasonable grounds for detention. (Para 4 , 5) |
| 3. state's justification for preventive detention. (Para 6 , 10 , 11) |
| 4. legal standards for preventive detention orders. (Para 7 , 8) |
| 5. conditions determining public order threats. (Para 12 , 13 , 14) |
| 6. final ruling quashing the detention order. (Para 15 , 16 , 17 , 18) |
JUDGMENT :
(Smt. Vibha Kankanwadi, J.)
Heard learned Advocate Mr.Jadhav for the petitioner and learned APP Mr.Doifode for the respondents.
2. Rule. Rule made returnable forthwith. The petition is heard finally with the consent of the learned Advocates for the parties.
3. The petition challenges the detention order passed by respondent No.2 against him bearing No.ADM/Home/Desk14(1) MPDA/WS 59/24, dated 05/02/2024 and its approval dated 14/02/2024 passed by respondent No.1 by invoking the powers of this Court under Article 226 of the Constitution of India.
4. The learned Advocate of the petitioner has taken us through the impugned orders and the material, which was before the Authorities at the time of passing the impugned orders. He submits that though several cases
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
