Back
NARENDRA KUMAR JOHARI, SANGEETA CHANDRA
Munna Alias Shahanwaz Thru. Father Shabban Khan – Appellant
Versus
State Of U. P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko. – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. writ petition with multiple prayers (Para 1) |
| 2. sequence of violent events leading to detention (Para 2 , 3 , 4) |
| 3. events and communications regarding the detention order. (Para 5 , 6 , 7 , 8 , 9 , 10 , 11 , 12 , 13) |
| 4. petitioner's arguments against the detaining authority's grounds. (Para 14 , 15 , 16) |
| 5. petitioner's claim of wrongful implication and lack of urgency. (Para 17 , 18 , 19) |
| 6. state's defense of the detention order's validity. (Para 20 , 21) |
| 7. arguments on communal tensions stemming from accused actions. (Para 22 , 23) |
| 8. the process and communication regarding detention order approval. (Para 24 , 25 , 26) |
| 9. central government's role in detention review process. (Para 27 , 28) |
| 10. addressing the procedural aspects of detention reviews. (Para 29) |
| 11. discussion on public order versus law and order. (Para 30) |
| 12. summary of hearing and decision regarding the detention. (Para 31) |
| 13. evaluation of the necessity for preventive detention. (Para 32 , 33) |
| 14. legal standards for assessing public order. (Para 34 , 35 , 36) |
| 15. differentiation between law and order and public order disturbances. (Para 37 , 38 , 39 , 40) |
| 16. arguments relating to preventive measures ba |
Preventive detention under the National Security Act requires subjective satisfaction of the authorities that the detenue is likely to disturb public order based on gathered evidence and present cond....
Preventive detention requires a clear demonstration of how actions disturb public order, not merely law and order, with timely issuance reflecting genuine concern for community safety.
Preventive detention under the National Security Act requires clear justification of public order disturbances, adherence to procedural safeguards, and can be validated by prior criminal history.
The detention order under the National Security Act was based on the subjective satisfaction of the detaining authority, considering the likelihood of the detainee being released from custody in the ....
Preventive detention requires clear, compelling reasons linked to public order; mere apprehensions are insufficient.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
