MANGESH S. PATIL, SHAILESH P. BRAHME
Aniket Arun Dhatrak (Died) through Rajashree Arun Dhatrak (Mother) – Appellant
Versus
Shalaka Aniket Dhatrak – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
MANGESH S. PATIL, J.
1. Admit.
2. At the joint request of the parties, we have heard both the sides finally at the stage of admission.
3. We had been called upon to decide a very interesting issue, as to whether the right to sue survives to the mother and brothers of the deceased husband of the respondent-wife in a petition for divorce by mutual consent filed under section 13-B of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 (‘Act’) when he dies even before the second motion under sub section (2) of section 13-B of the Act is moved.
4. The facts can be stated in brief as under:
(ii) Pursuant to some mutual agreement, Aniket had agreed to pay Rs.5,00,000/- to Shalaka while filing of petition as per terms he paid Rs.2,50,000/- to her.
(iii) Unfortunately, Aniket died during COVID-19 on 15-04- 2021.
(iv) Respondent-Shalaka submitted a purshis (Exhibit-8) on 28-04-2021, withdrawing the consent for granting divorce and requested for disposing of the petition.
(v) However, the appellants herein who are the mother and brothers of Aniket submitted application (Exhibi
Ashok Hurra Vs. Rupa Bipin Zaveri
Hitesh Bhatnagar Vs. Deepa Bhatnagar
Jayshree Ramesh Londhe Vs. Ramesh Bhikaji Londhe
Kamalabai Vs. Ramdas Manga Ingale
Lubhan Gopal Nikhare Vs. Sandhya
The right to seek divorce under Section 13-B of the Hindu Marriage Act is personal and does not survive after the death of a party.
Point of law: Requirement under Section 13B(2) of Hindu Marriage Act is the “motion of both parties”.
The main legal point established in the judgment is that mutual consent for divorce must continue until the decree is passed, and the court must be satisfied about the existence of mutual consent bet....
A party may withdraw consent for mutual divorce at any time before the decree, affecting maintenance claims.
The court emphasized the necessity of mutual consent and the consideration of subsequent developments in divorce proceedings under the Hindu Marriage Act.
The judgment emphasizes the importance of mutual consent for divorce under Section 13-B of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955, and the significance of Rule 31 of the Family Courts (Maharashtra) Rules, 1987....
Withdrawing consent to a mutual divorce under Section 13B(2) of the HMA does not constitute an abuse of process of law, allowing criminal proceedings to continue.
Point of law: Mutual divorce – Waiving of six month periods - it will be open to the Court to exercise its discretion in the facts and circumstances of each case where there is no possibility of part....
The statutory cooling-off period under Section 13-B(2) of the Hindu Marriage Act is directory, allowing for a divorce by mutual consent even at the appellate stage.
Withdrawal of consent to mutual divorce under Section 13B(2) of the HMA does not constitute abuse of process, as mutual consent must exist at both stages of divorce proceedings.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.