SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

RAVINDRA V. GHUGE, ASHWIN D. BHOBE
Prathamesh Nayan Mulye – Appellant
Versus
State of Maharashtra – Respondent


Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Petitioner: Chetan G. Patil
For the Respondent: Vikas M. Mali

JUDGMENT :

ASHWIN D. BHOBE, J.

1. Rule. Rule made returnable immediately and heard finally with the consent of the parties.

2. The Petitioner by the present Petition challenges the Order dated 20th October 2024 passed by the Respondent No. 3 refusing to grant approval to the appointment of the Petitioner to the post of Laboratory Assistant. Petitioner has sought for the following substantive reliefs:

    “(A) That this Hon’ble Court may be pleased to issue a writ of certiorari thereby quashing and setting aside the Order dated20th October 2022 (being Exhibit “B” hereto) passed by Respondent No. 3 herein thereby refusing to grant approval to the appointment of the Petitioner in Respondent No. 5 School and further be released to direct the Respondent No. 3 herein to grant approval to the appointment of the Petitioner on the post of Lab. Assistant on 11th July 2012 in Respondent No. 5 School with all consequential benefits.

    (B) That this Hon’ble Court may be pleased to issue a writ of mandamus thereby directing the Respondent No. 2 herein to enter the name of the Petitioner in the Shalarth system and issue Shalarth Identity to the Petitioner and further direct the Respondents to release grant

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top