IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY, BENCH AT AURANGABAD
R. G. AVACHAT, ABASAHEB D. SHINDE
Baliram s/o Pandurang Salunke – Appellant
Versus
State of Maharashtra – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. employment approval denial cited various procedural grounds. (Para 3 , 4 , 5) |
| 2. petitioner asserts lawful appointment in response to vacancy. (Para 6 , 7 , 8) |
| 3. management’s actions were justified in light of the circumstances. (Para 10 , 11 , 12) |
| 4. court emphasized accountability for educational authority's delays. (Para 15 , 16 , 17) |
JUDGEMENT
(Per Abasaheb D. Shinde, J.)
1. Rule. Rule made returnable forthwith. With the consent of parties heard finally at the stage of admission.
2. The petitioner is challenging the order dated 27.08.2019 passed by Respondent No.2-Education Officer (Secondary) Zilla Parishad, Nanded by which the proposal submitted for grant of approval to the appointment of the petitioner as Shikshan Sevak has been turned down.
FACTUAL MATRIX :
3. The petitioner contends that Respondent No.3/Educational Institution is running Respondent No.4-School from 5th to 10th standard. It is further contended that on account of retirement of a permanent teacher, namely Smt. Shanta Narmada Karle, Respondent No.3 issued an advertisement on 27.02.2017 in a newspaper, namely, ‘Daily Marathwada’. It is the contention of the petitioner that petitioner had participate
Approval for appointment of educational staff must adhere to existing vacancies and established communication protocol; unmanaged delays by authorities warrant administrative accountability.
The main legal point established in the judgment is that the management must adhere to the rules and regulations for the appointment of staff in private schools, including the obligation to ascertain....
Appointments must be made against available sanctioned vacancies, and the initial entry of an employee must comply with the Rules and Regulations governing such entry.
The main legal point established is that vacancies in the open category should be filled from the open category, and the ban on recruitment may not apply in certain circumstances.
The main legal point established is that routine affairs of an institution, including appointments and approvals, should be considered independently of disputes in management.
The recruitment process for non-teaching staff in aided schools must adhere to transparency and fundamental rights, ensuring that candidates are not penalized for management's irregularities.
Strict compliance with the Government Resolution and Rules regarding the appointment process is essential, and appointments in violation of these provisions will not be approved.
Staff appointments valid despite officer inaction if procedure followed sans fraud; 2013 staffing GR inoperative ab initio per 2015 abeyance; prior patterns apply to interim vacancies; no retrospecti....
The termination of the teacher was unlawful as it violated principles of natural justice, and the appointment was validly made under due process against a clear vacancy reserved for Scheduled Tribe.
The central legal point established in the judgment is that the management of Private Schools is obligated to consider non-teaching staff for appointment to the post of Shikshan Sevak if they acquire....
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.