URMILA JOSHI-PHALKE
Pachu Jaidev Bishwas – Appellant
Versus
State of Maharashtra – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
1. By this appeal, the appellant (the accused) has challenged judgment and order dated 23.7.2004 passed by learned 4th Ad hoc Additional Sessions Judge, Chandrapur (learned Judge of the trial court), in Sessions Case No.32/2000.
2. By the said judgment impugned, the accused is convicted for offence punishable under Section 307 of the Indian Penal Code and sentenced to undergo rigorous imprisonment for five years and to pay fine Rs.2,000/-, in default, to undergo rigorous imprisonment for six months.
3. Brief facts of the prosecution case are as under:
Gautam Gaurang Baid (the informant) has lodged report at Ramnagar Police Station, Chandrapur that he along with his parents is residing at Bangali Camp Nehru Nagar Chowk, Chandrapur. On 2.4.1999, between 8:00 pm to 8:15 pm, he along with his friends was proceeding towards the house of his sister Shilabai at Shamnagar. He noticed a quarrel near “Durga Temple” and, therefore, he approached the said persons and saw that the accused was assaulting Shakti Mandal by means of knife and the other accused Pankaj Bishwas and Ribhang were also assaulting Shakti Mandal. Due to the assault, Shakti Mandal sustained injuries on his abdomen an
Gian Singh vs. State of Punjab and another
Ishwarsingh vs. State of Madhya Pradesh
The prosecution must prove its case beyond reasonable doubt; inconsistencies in witness testimonies and lack of corroborative evidence can lead to acquittal.
The main legal point established in the judgment is the reliance on credible and corroborative evidence, including the testimony of injured witnesses and medical officers, to prove the complicity of ....
Intention in culpable homicide is inferred from the nature of the weapon used, the location of injuries, and conduct indicating a purposeful act to achieve a harmful outcome.
Prosecution must prove guilt beyond reasonable doubt; significant contradictions in witness testimony can invalidate a case leading to acquittal.
The court emphasized that when reasonable doubt exists regarding a prosecution's case, it must favor the accused, leading to acquittal.
Criminal Law - Common Intention - Liability of one person for an offence committed by another in the course of criminal act perpetrated by several persons arises under Section 34 if such criminal act....
The court clarified that a conviction for attempted murder requires clear evidence of intent, which was lacking, thus warranting a lesser charge.
The court clarified that for a conviction under section 307 IPC, there must be clear evidence of intent to kill, which was not established in this case.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.