Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
RAVINDRA V. GHUGE, RAJESH S. PATIL, JJ.
Onkar Chandrakant Teli – Appellant
Versus
The State Of Maharashtra – Respondent
JUDGMENT
Ravindra V. Ghuge, J.
1. This matter was heard for quite some time on 9th January, 2025. Petitioner No.2 was present in the Court. We granted an overnight pass-over to enable the learned Advocate for the Petitioners to take instructions.
2. Today, the learned Advocate submits, on instructions from Petitioner No.2, who is present in the Court, that they pray for an order.
3. Rule. Rule made returnable forthwith and heard finally by the consent of the parties.
4. The Petitioners comprise of the husband of the Complainant, parents-in-law and the sisters-in-law. They have put forth prayer clause 14 (i) as under:
“i) F.I.R.No. 0220 of 2023 dated 31.03.2023 registered by respondent no.2 may kindly be quashed on the ground that there is no offence made out against the Petitioners”.
5. A First Information Report (FIR) bearing No. 0123 of 2023, was registered on 22nd March, 2023 at 20:58 hours with the N.M.Joshi Marg Police Station, Brihan Mumbai (City). All these Petitioners are arrayed as the Accused in the said FIR. Subsequently, the FIR was transferred to the Samta Nagar Police Station, and was registered on 31st March, 2023 at 00: 23 hours (00:23 am) and renumbered as 0220 of 2023.
6.
The court emphasized that FIRs can be quashed if allegations do not constitute a prima facie case, highlighting the need for clear evidence of wrongdoing.
Vague and omnibus allegations in FIR do not constitute a cognizable offence; however, if allegations disclose prima facie commission of offences, FIR cannot be quashed.
The FIR must make out an offence against a particular accused, and the court should refrain from making observations about the narration of offences to avoid prejudice.
Quashing of Criminal proceedings- Conferred under Section 482 of the Code to quash the criminal proceedings for the non-compoundable offences under Section 320 of the Code can be exercised having ove....
In domestic violence cases, general and vague allegations are insufficient; specific instances must be provided to avoid misuse of legal provisions.
The main legal point established in the judgment is that the power to quash an FIR should be exercised sparingly and only in exceptional cases, as per the guidelines laid down by the Supreme Court.
The High Court cannot quash an FIR unless the allegations do not constitute an offence; the judiciary must respect the trial process and not supplant it with its judgment on the merits of the case.
The High Court can quash FIRs against individuals named in dowry harassment cases when allegations are general, vague, and lack specificity, preventing abuse of the legal process.
In 498A matrimonial cases, quash proceedings against relatives on vague/general allegations lacking specific roles, especially with FIR delay, to curb family over-implication and process abuse.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
