Manoj Abhimanyu Patil vs Mansi Labour Suppliers

Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation

2025 Supreme(Bom) 491

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY AT AURANGABAD BENCH
Y. G. KHOBRAGADE, J
Manoj Abhimanyu Patil – Appellant
Versus
Mansi Labour Suppliers – Respondent

Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
Mr. S. S. Bora, Advocate for the Petitioner,
Mr. Vinod P. Patil, Advocate for the Respondent

JUDGMENT :

(Y.G. KHOBRAGADE, J.)

1. Rule. Rule made returnable forthwith and with the consent of both the parties heard finally.

2. By the present Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India r/w Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code, 1973, the Petitioner takes exception to the judgment dated 22.04.2024 passed by the learned Additional Sessions Judge-4, Jalgaon in Criminal Revision Application No. 113/2023, whereby affirmed the order passed by the learned Judicial Magistrate First Class, Jamner, below Exh. 19 on 25.09.2023 in S. C. C. No. 739/2022.

3. The Petitioner is the original accused and Respondent is the original complainant in Summary Criminal Case No. 739/2022. (For the sake of brevity, parties to the present petition hereinafter be referred in their original capacity as “accused ” and “complainant”).

4. Shri Dipak Abhimanyu Patil, the Proprietor of the Complainant firm and accused Shri Manoj Abhimanyu Patil are real brothers. By profession, the accused is Tax Consultant since 2006. On 22.02.2017, the Investment Agreement & Memorandum of Understanding was executed between the accused and Complainant. As per the memorandum of understanding, the accused offered mo