SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(HP) 124

IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA
SANDEEP SHARMA
Ramesh – Appellant
Versus
Ram Kumar – Respondent


Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Petitioners:Mr. P.S. Chandel, Advocate
For the Respondent:Mr. Ajay Kumar Chauhan, Advocate

Judgement Key Points

Key Points: - The interim compensation under Section 143-A NI Act is discretionary and must consider merits of both parties and provide opportunity for defence; orders can be quashed if not properly reasoned or fair (!) (!) (!) (!) . - Courts may grant interim compensation up to 20% of the cheque amount; the amount and existence of compensation depend on evaluating pleadings, defence, and circumstances; there must be application of mind and rational reasoning in the order (!) (!) (!) . - Courts should give a reasonable opportunity to the accused to file reply or defence under Section 143-A and record brief reasons indicating consideration of relevant factors; presumption under Section 139 NI Act is not by itself a ground to pay interim compensation (!) (!) (!) . - The words "may" in Section 143-A are not necessarily mandatory; the court’s discretion is bounded by fair application of mind and the 20% cap; improper, non-reasoned orders can be quashed (!) (!) (!) (!) . - The recovery of interim compensation can be treated as a fine under CrPC Section 421, and proceedings can be quashed with directions to consider afresh while maintaining deposited amounts (!) (!) (!) (!) . - Coordination between prima facie case and defence response is essential; orders lacking mind or adequate hearing are susceptible to modification or cancellation (!) (!) . - The judgment directs afresh consideration of interim compensation in light of proper legal framework and fairness, with existing deposits to remain (!) (!) (!) .

What is the discretionary nature of interim compensation under Section 143-A of the NI Act and whether it requires an opportunity of hearing?

What are the required considerations and factors a court must apply when awarding interim compensation under Section 143-A of the NI Act?

What is the proper procedure and scope for revisiting or quashing interim compensation orders issued under Section 143-A of the NI Act?


Table of Content
1. overview of court's jurisdiction. (Para 1)
2. facts of the cheque dishonour case. (Para 2)
3. accused's argument on denial of natural justice. (Para 3)
4. complainant's counterargument on statutory provisions. (Para 4)
5. court's scrutiny of section 143-a ni act. (Para 5 , 6 , 7 , 8)
6. criteria for award of interim compensation. (Para 9 , 10)
7. final order and instructions for lower court. (Para 11)
JUDGMENT :
Sandeep Sharma, J.

Being aggrieved and dissatisfied with orders dated 04.06.2024 passed by Judicial Magistrate First Class, Jubbal, District Shimla, Himachal Pradesh (Camp at Rohru) and 18.06.2025 passed by Judicial Magistrate First Class, Court No.II, Rohru, District Shimla, Himachal Pradesh (Annexures P-1 and P-2), whereby petitioner- accused (in short “accused”) came to be directed to pay interim compensation equivalent to 20% of the cheque amount within 60 days from the date of order, in terms of Section 143-A of Negotiable Instruments Act (in short “NI Act”) as inserted by Act 20 of 2018, accused has approached this Court in the instant proceedings filed under Section 528 of Bharatiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita, praying therein to quash and set aside the afores


Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top