Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD
S. G. MEHARE, SANDIPKUMAR C. MORE, JJ
Archana W/o Shailendra Gaikwad – Appellant
Versus
Shyam s/o Shivajirao Lohi – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
Sandipkumar C. More, J.
1. Rule. Rule made returnable forthwith. Heard finally with the consent of the rival parties.
2. The subject matter under challenge in both these writ petitions, is the order dated 30/07/2024 in Original Application No.600 of 2024 passed by the Maharashtra Administrative Tribunal, Mumbai Bench at Aurangabad (hereinafter referred to as ‘the learned Tribunal’). The learned Tribunal under the impugned order has quashed and set aside Government Resolution dated 13/06/2024 issued by respondent No.2-State in Writ Petition No.8511 of 2024 under which modification in the posting on promotion given to the petitioner in the same petition i.e. Smt. Archana Shailendra Gaikwad affecting the earlier promotional posting granted to the present respondent No.1 – Shri Shyam Shivajirao Lohi in this petition. It is to be noted that under Writ Petition N.9474 of 2024 the State through Additional Chief Secretary, Home (Transport) Department Mantralaya, Mumbai, has also challenged the same judgment and order passed by the learned Tribunal. Thus, both petitions are for quashing the Government Resolution dated 13/06/2024 under which the petitioner – Archana has been posted
Judicial review is warranted when administrative decisions lack reasoning and appear arbitrary, particularly in matters of promotional postings.
Judicial review is warranted when administrative decisions lack reasoning and appear arbitrary, particularly in matters of promotional postings.
Judicial interference in employee transfers limited unless mala fide or statutory violation; administrative guidelines not enforceable rights.
The main legal point established in the judgment is that the power of transfer and posting should be exercised honestly, bona fide, and reasonably, based on administrative exigency and public interes....
The court upheld the employer's discretion in posting decisions, finding no malice or illegality in the posting order after promotion.
Transfer orders in public service must be made based on administrative necessity and public interest, and cannot be influenced by political pressure or arbitrary decisions.
Spouse posting policy requires specific reasons for denial; vague 'public interest' insufficient, allowing promotion relinquishment for retention.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
