Bank Can Adjust OTS Deposit on Borrower Default, No Cheating u/s 420 IPC: Delhi High Court
02 Mar 2026
Divij Kumar Quits CMS INDUSLAW for Independent Practice
03 Mar 2026
Global Lawyers Debate AI Liability in Autonomous Vehicles
03 Mar 2026
CCPA Fines Startup ₹8 Lakh for False Child Growth Claims
05 Mar 2026
Madras High Court Scoffs at Police Custody Injury Claim
05 Mar 2026
India's Criminal Investigations Face Systemic Conviction Crisis
05 Mar 2026
Kerala HC Slams TDB Financial Discipline in Ayyappa Conclave, Orders Auditor Report on Past Anomalies: High Court of Kerala
06 Mar 2026
ST Members Can Invoke Section 13B HMA If Hinduised By Customs: Chhattisgarh High Court
06 Mar 2026
Lease Cancellation Valid Even by 'In-Charge' Mining Officer Under OMMC Rules: Orissa High Court
06 Mar 2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY, NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR
HON'BLE SMT. JUSTICE URMILA SACHIN JOSHI- PHALKE
Suraj Balram Mishra – Appellant
Versus
Election Commission of India – Respondent
Headnote: Read headnote
JUDGMENT :
URMILA JOSHI-PHALKE, J.
1. By the present election petition, the petitioner has challenged the election of respondent No.5 - Nitin Jairam Gadkari on the ground that the Bharatiya Janta Party (BJP) and its workers have violated the Model Code of Conduct. It is alleged that Software was created and slips were distributed to voters having photographs, name of respondent No.5 - Nitin Jairam Gadkari and symbol of the BJP. It is further alleged that machines were given to the representatives of all booths of Nagpur. The main function of the machine was to print the voters’ details having photos, name of respondent No.5 - Nitin Jairam Gadkari and symbol of the BJP. Thus, respondent No.5 - Nitin Jairam Gadkari and the BJP committed violation of Code of Conduct. The respondent No.5 - Nitin Jairam Gadkari by means of corrupt practices violated the Model Code of Conduct. Various complaints including the complaint of the petitioner were lodged as to the said violation. However, no cognizance was taken and hence the petition.
2. By this petition, the petition
An election petition must disclose specific material facts and particulars of corrupt practices; failure to do so results in dismissal under the Representation of the People Act.
An election petition must comply with statutory requirements, including joining necessary parties and pleading material facts; failure to do so results in dismissal.
An election petition must comply with mandatory provisions of the Representation of the People Act, including the joinder of necessary parties, or it is liable to be dismissed.
An election petition may be rejected if it fails to comply with mandatory pleading requirements regarding concise statements of material facts and particulars of corrupt practices as per the Represen....
Election petitions must contain concise statements of material facts; omission of a single material fact leads to dismissal for lack of cause of action.
An election petition may be dismissed summons under CPC if it fails to disclose a triable cause of action; non-disclosure of material liabilities can render an election void under the Representation ....
Allegations of corrupt practice in an election petition must be supported by specific material facts and full particulars as required by Section 83 of the RP Act of 1951. Failure to plead such materi....
The election petition must contain concise material facts and full particulars of any corrupt practice, and failure to disclose even a single material fact would entail dismissal of the election peti....
Election petitions must contain precise and material facts, especially concerning alleged corrupt practices, as mandated by Section 83 of the Representation of People Act, 1951.
The failure to plead sufficient material facts in an election petition can be fatal, but prima facie material facts allowing for further proceedings may still exist.
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.