2025:BHC-AUG:886-DB IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD.
958 CONT. PETITION NO. 498 OF 2021 IN WP/1271/2015 Raghunath Laxman Pathare ..Petitioner Versus Secretary Department of State of Maharashtra and Others ..Respondents …..
Shri. Dattatraya R. Jayabhar, Advocate for the Petitioner Shri. S. V. Hange, AGP for Respondent / State Shri. P. D. Suryawanshi, Advocate for Respondent No.4 …..
CORAM : R. G. AVACHAT AND NEERAJ P. DHOTE, JJ.
Dated : JANUARY 10, 2025
JUDGMENT :
1. The learned Advocate for the Petitioner states that the Order dated 25.01.2016 passed by this Court in Writ Petition No.1271 of 2015 has been complied with by the concerned Respondent and nothing survives for consideration in the Contempt Petition.
2. In view of the above statement, the Contempt Petition stands disposed of.
Compliance with a court order negates the grounds for a contempt petition, rendering it moot.
Compliance with court order evidenced by proceedings ends contempt petition.
Contempt petition closed upon compliance via order challenged separately, liberty granted for further remedy.
Compliance with the court order is crucial in contempt proceedings.
Compliance with court order averred by petitioner's counsel leads to closure of contempt proceedings.
Counsel's submission of compliance closes contempt petition without inquiry.
Contempt petition closed upon submission of evidence of compliance with court order.
Contempt petition closed upon submission of compliance order with prior court direction.
Court found no non-compliance with order; contempt petition closed.
Compliance with the court order is essential to avoid contempt proceedings.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.