Back
BOMBAY HIGH COURT
RAGHUNATH LAXMAN PATHARE – Appellant
Versus
SECRETARY DEPARTMENT OF STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
1. The learned Advocate for the Petitioner states that the Order dated 25.01.2016 passed by this Court in Writ Petition No.1271 of 2015 has been complied with by the concerned Respondent and nothing survives for consideration in the Contempt Petition.
2. In view of the above statement, the Contempt Petition stands disposed of.
Compliance with a court order negates the grounds for a contempt petition, rendering it moot.
Contempt petition closed upon compliance via order challenged separately, liberty granted for further remedy.
Compliance with the court order is crucial in contempt proceedings.
Counsel's submission of compliance closes contempt petition without inquiry.
Contempt petition closed upon submission of compliance order with prior court direction.
Compliance with the court order is essential to avoid contempt proceedings.
Compliance with court orders as a fundamental obligation under contempt law is upheld.
Compliance with court orders is confirmed, leading to the closure of the contempt petition.
Compliance with court order averts contempt liability upon proof of execution.
Contempt petition closed upon petitioners' submission of subsequent compliance with prior court order.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
