Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
B.P.COLABAWALLA, FIRDOSH P.POONIWALLA
Lallubhai Amichand Limited – Appellant
Versus
Sunil Jagmohandas Shah – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. jurisdiction and structure of the case (Para 1 , 2 , 3) |
| 2. factual background of family business ownership (Para 4 , 5) |
| 3. arguments regarding interim injunction and family arrangement (Para 7 , 8) |
| 4. overview of the appeals and the parties involved in the litigation. (Para 10) |
| 5. court's findings on equitable rights and director's reinstatement. (Para 11 , 31) |
| 6. court's observations on family arrangements and their enforcement (Para 12 , 14) |
| 7. quasi-partnership principles applied in corporate context (Para 15 , 18) |
| 8. nature of family arrangement and the quasi-partnership context underlying the company. (Para 20 , 40) |
| 9. conclusions on mandatory injunction and director reinstatement (Para 37 , 49) |
JUDGMENT :
FIRDOSH P. POONIWALLA, J.
1. This judgement disposes of the following three Appeals:
a) Appeal (L) No.30581 of 2023 which has been filed by Lallubhai Amichand Limited impugning the Order dated 25th October 2023 passed by the Learned Single Judge of this Court in Interim Application (L) No.22820 of 2023 in Suit (L) No.22818 of 2023 granting ad-interim reliefs.
b) Appeal (L) No.32111 of 2023 has also been filed by Lallubhai Amichand Limited impugning the Order dated 10th
The main legal point established in the judgment is the binding effect of the settlement between the parties, the waiver of the right to seek re-employment by the workmen, and the entitlement of the ....
A lockout is justified if it is declared in response to an illegal strike or a strike that is in breach of a settlement or award.
The combination of eyewitness testimonies, recovery of the weapon used, and forensic examination results can establish guilt in criminal cases, even based on circumstantial evidence.
The conviction of an accused person under Section 27(3) of the Arms Act is not permissible in law if the accused is also charged with committing murder under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code.
The court can enhance compensation based on the deceased's income and family dependency, and adjust the multiplier used by the Tribunal if found unjustified.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
