Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY AURANGABAD BENCH
SHAILESH P.BRAHME
Saifan Hussain Nadaf Since Dead through legal heirs, Tolan Saifan Nadaf – Appellant
Versus
State of Maharashtra – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. review of land ownership records is pivotal during disputes. (Para 1) |
| 2. ownership dispute over land after consolidation. (Para 2 , 3 , 4 , 7 , 18) |
| 3. referring issues to competent authority under the act. (Para 5 , 6) |
| 4. arguments regarding jurisdiction and procedural compliance. (Para 8 , 9 , 10) |
| 5. the importance of adhering to procedural mandates during inquiries. (Para 11 , 12) |
| 6. assessment of minister's jurisdiction and delay condonation. (Para 20 , 21 , 22 , 23) |
| 7. importance of thorough hearings and opportunity for parties. (Para 24 , 25) |
| 8. inquiry findings must align with operational principles of law. (Para 30 , 31) |
| 9. judgment upholding legality of minister's order. (Para 32 , 33) |
| 10. final order on inquiry and appearance before records. (Para 44 , 46 , 47) |
JUDGMENT :
SHAILESH P. BRAHME, J.
1. Rule. Rule is made returnable forthwith. Heard finally with the consent of learned counsel for the parties.
2. This writ petition is directed against the order of the learned Minister passed on 09.09.2019, setting aside order of 09.02.2011 passed by District Superintendent of Land Record, and remitting the matter for fresh enquiry to the said authority. Petitioner and the R
Minister has jurisdiction under Section 35 of the Act to entertain appeals, even after delays, when assessing legality of prior orders; remands for inquiries on land titles following consolidation mu....
Point of Law : If there was any technical violation of the rules of natural justice, that was not a ground for interference, as such interference would result in resurrection of an illegal, nay, void....
Delay in filing an appeal against consolidation orders must be satisfactorily explained; otherwise, the order is invalid due to lack of jurisdiction.
The court clarified that applications for correction of consolidation schemes must be filed within a reasonable time, typically three years, and that significant delays render such applications inval....
Personal action dies with the death of the person on the maxim action personalis moritur cum persona. But this operates only in a limited class of actions Ex delicto, such as action for damages for d....
Orders and titles obtained through fraud are nullities; rightful ownership should not be barred by procedural delays attributable to such fraud.
Petitioners' failure to timely assert their land rights bars their claim under the U.P. Consolidation of Holdings Act, 1953.
The court established that under the Consolidation and Holdings Act, 1953, authorities retain the power to correct entries in revenue records even after the finalization of consolidation proceedings,....
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
