MANISH KUMAR
Ram Sukh – Appellant
Versus
Deputy Director Of Consolidation, Sultanpur – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
Manish Kumar, J.
1. Heard learned counsel for petitioner as well as Shri Hemant Kumar Pandey, learned State Counsel.
2. The present writ petition has been preferred for quashing of the impugned revisional order dated 12.04.2024 passed by respondent no. 1, Deputy Director of Consolidation and impugned appellate order dated 04.03.2024 passed by respondent no. 2 i.e. Settlement Officer Consolidation, District Sultanpur.
3 The learned counsel for the respondent nos. 8 and 9 has stated that it would not be necessary to file counter affidavit and the matter may be heard at this stage itself.
4. Learned counsel for petitioner has submitted that the dispute is with regard to Gata No. 2774 (new number) and the old number was Gata No. 1652, Area-2 Biswa. The petitioners and respondents were co-tenant on the above mentioned gata number.
5. It is further submitted that initially Ram Kalap and RajNath Singh, son of Sahdev, i.e. respondent nos. 8 and 9 were the co-tenant of 1 Biswa and on another 1 Biswa, the ancestors of the petitioners namely late Urai and late Ram Kishan along with their brother Bhagirathi i.e. fathers of respondent nos. 3, 4 and 5.
6. It is further submitted that the nam
Gadde Venkateswara Rao v. Govt. of A.P.; AIR 1966 SC 828
Mohammad Swalleh v. Third Additonal District Judge
Ramesh Chandra Sankla and Others vs. Vikram Cement and Others and other connected matters
Roshan Deen vs. Preeti Lal; (2002) 1 SCC 100
Shangrila Food Products Ltd. v. LIC
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.