Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
A.S.GADKARI, KAMAL KHATA
Hiroo Tuljaram Shahani – Appellant
Versus
State of Maharashtra represented through Government Pleader, OS, High Court – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. petitioners assert grievance against bmc's actions. (Para 1 , 2 , 3) |
| 2. breach of undertaking undermines court authority. (Para 4 , 10 , 15) |
| 3. contempt jurisdiction protects judicial integrity. (Para 14) |
| 4. court upholds accountability through penalties. (Para 16 , 18 , 19 , 20) |
Judgment :
Kamal Khata, J.
1. The Petitioners are occupants of ground floor of the premises bearing No.14/A, New Hindustan CHS Ltd situated on Plot No.272, 36th Road, Bandra (West), Mumbai 400050 (‘writ premises’). By this Petition, the Petitioners challenge the Notice dated 14th March, 2020 issued under Section 53(1) of the Maharashtra Regional Town Planning Act 1966 (‘MRTP Act’) as well as the speaking Order dated 29th April 2022 passed by the Brihanmumbai Municipal Corporation (‘BMC’). The speaking Order identifies seven violations, which are in contravention of the approved plan dated 5th January 1967.
2. The nine grounds listed at pages 18 to 20 highlight three principal grievances:
a) that, the Petitioners were not granted an opportunity of being heard,
b) that, the Petitioners have not carried out any unauthorised construction and whatever renovations they had carried out were long ago wi
Parties must comply with judicial orders to uphold the authority of the court and the rule of law.
Repeated litigation without revealing prior judicial orders constitutes an abuse of process, warranting contempt proceedings to ensure compliance with court directives.
Contempt of Court – Courts ordinarily take lenient approach in a case of some delay in compliance of orders, unless same is deliberate and willful.
Contempt proceedings require proof of willful disobedience to a court order, which was not established as respondents lacked knowledge of the order.
The main legal point established in the judgment is that willful disobedience of a court order, as defined in the Contempt of Courts Act, can lead to punishment under Section 12 of the Act.
Contempt of Court – Any person who misuses process of Court with ulterior motives cannot be said to be a person having approached Court with clean hands – A person who tries to tarnish process of lit....
The Municipal Corporation's failure to comply with Court orders regarding illegal structures constitutes contempt, necessitating immediate action to uphold the rule of law.
Once action is initiated pursuant to a court direction, a contempt petition may be closed.
The court established that unauthorized constructions cannot be regularized and that compliance with municipal regulations is mandatory for legality.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
