SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Bom) 1416

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
Manish Pitale, Manjusha Deshpande, JJ.
Roshan Jaywant Pagare - Appellant
Versus
State of Maharashtra - Respondent
Appeal No. 178 of 2021 With Interim Application No. 1733 of 2022, Appeal No. 181 of 2021 With Interim Application No. 718 of 2021, Appeal No. 191 of 2021 With Interim Application No. 741 of 2021, Appeal No. 189 of 2021 With Interim Application No. 735 of 2021, Appeal No. 634 of 2024
Decided On : 01-12-2025

Advocates Appeared:
For the Appellant : Ms. Pushpa Ganediwala a/w. Ms. Anima Mishra, Mr. Vinod Patil, Mr. Anuj Singh, Mr. Anshu Agrawal and Mr. Ankit Rathod for appellant in
For the Respondent: Ms. Sangita Phad, APP

The conviction of the accused was reversed due to insufficient corroboration of eye-witness accounts and the potential for false implication stemming from previous enmity.

Headnote:(A) Indian Penal Code, 1860 - Sections 302, 324, 143, 147, 148 and 307 - Conviction of appellants for involvement in a violent assault resulting in death - Court found reliance on the direct evidence of injured eye-witnesses, despite noticing inconsistencies. The trial Court acquitted other accused, citing insufficient evidence against them while convicting appellants based primarily on testimonies of two injured witnesses. (Paras 7, 12, 56)

(B) Criminal Law - The prosecution's reliance on the testimony of injured eye-witnesses was scrutinized for consistency and reliability, especially considering the presence of personal enmity and the timing of the FIR registration. (Paras 44, 50, 54)

Facts of the case:
The appellants were convicted for the brutal assault leading to the death of a victim, amidst testimonies of injured witnesses regarding the assault and recovery of weapons. The implications of previous enmity were discussed.

Findings of Court:
The trial Court primarily based its conclusions on injured eye-witness testimonies while acquitting other co-accused for lack of evidence - direct evidence of injured witnesses considered sufficient for conviction, subject to the scrutiny of potential false implication due to prior enmity.

Issues: The core issues included the reliability of eye-witness testimonies, the implications of prior enmity, delays in FIR registration, and lack of corroborative evidence.

Ratio Decidendi: The court asserted that while direct eye-witnesses are generally reliable, lacking corroboration and the personal stakes of the witnesses cast doubt on their credibility; hence, conviction on such evidence alone was flawed.

Result: Appeals allowed, conviction set aside, appellants acquitted.

Table of Content
1. overview of the incident and facts of the case (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 4)
2. defendants' primary arguments against conviction (Para 10 , 11 , 12 , 13 , 14)
3. court's observations on evidential assessments (Para 24 , 29 , 31 , 35)
4. final conclusion and order of acquittal (Para 58 , 59 , 60)

JUDGMENT :

MANISH PITALE, J.

By these appeals, the appellants (original accused Nos.1 and 3 to 6) have challenged judgment and order dated 10.11.2020 passed by the Court of Additional Sessions Judge (Court No.6), Nashik, hereinafter referred to as the trial Court, whereby the appellants have been convicted and sentenced under Sections 302, 324, 143, 147, 148 and 307 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (IPC). They have been sentenced for imprisonment under the aforesaid provisions, for periods ranging between 6 months to rigorous imprisonment for life, along with directions to pay fine amounts, failing which specific sentences of imprisonment have been imposed. The original accused Nos.2, 7 and 8 were acquitted by the trial Court.

2. The case of the prosecution in brief is that in the night of 17.08.2017 at about 10:00 p.m., when Suraj Khode (P.W.4) went for a walk and reached in the front of Happy Games Zone, Kala Nagar, Nashik, he met Amol Nikam (P.W.5) and Nikhil More i.e. the deceased. They were talking on the stairs in the front of Happy Games Zone, when suddenly John Kajale (A6) came from the side of the wall of Venkatesh Krupa Building and said to Nikhil More as to why he had been telling Pravin Kakad to beat Arif Qureshi (A1) and that he would not leave Nikhil More alive. Upon saying this, John Kajale (A6) gave two to three blows using a sickle on the head of Nikhil More and at this point in time, Suraj Khode (P.W.4) and Amol Nikam (P.W.5) started shouting. Sharad Pagare (A3) came to the spot and used a gun to fire one or two shots in the air and Arif Qureshi (A1) appeared on the scene and hit Nikhil More with a sickle on his body, while Roshan Pagare (A4) and Amar Gangurde (A5), gave chopper blows to Nikhil More on his abdomen. It is stated that while Suraj Khode (P.W.4) and Amol Nikam (P.W.5) tried to save Nikhil More, Arif Qureshi (A1) assaulted both of them with sickle blows, thereby causing injuries to the right hand and right thigh of Suraj Khode (P.W.4) and to the left side of back of Amol Nikam (P.W.5). Amar Gangurde (A5) also gave chopper blows on left shoulder and chest of Amol Nikam (P.W.5).

3. According to the prosecution, Sachin Kadam (P.W.6) and Ajay Pawar, who knew Suraj Khode (P.W.4), had reached the other side of the road near medical store to buy medicines, and upon watching the assault, they started pelting stones towards the accused persons. Sharad Pagare (A3) at that time, was pointing the gun towards Suraj Khode (P.W.4), who was lying on the floor. But, due to pelting of stones, his attention was diverted and the accused persons ran towards Sachin Kadam (P.W.6) and others across the road. At this point, Suraj Khode (P.W.4) and Amol Nikam (P.W.5) ran towards Balaji Square to save their lives, while Nikhil More was lying in injured condition in front of Happy Games Zone. Suraj Khode (P.W.4) and Amol Nikam (P.W.5) then saw their other friends Gorakh Nathe and Saurabh Junagade at Balaji Square, whom they told about the assault due to which, Nikhil More had been seriously injured. Thereupon, Suraj Khode (P.W.4) and Amol Nikam (P.W.5) and the said Gorakh Nathe and Saurabh Junagade returned to the spot of the incident and took the injured Nikhil More in the Maruti car of Gorakh Nathe to Sanjivani Hospital.

4. It is stated that upon reaching the said hospital, Nikhil More was lying still and when Suraj Khode (P.W.4) and others were standing in the porch of Sanjivani Hospital, police came and took Suraj Khode (P.W.4) and Amol Nikam (P.W.5) for treatment to Civil Hospital. While they were being treated at the Civil Hospital, they came to know about the death of Nikhil More. The police conducted spot panchanama as also in

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top