SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Bom) 1576

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
AMIT BORKAR, J.
Nair Pushpa Sureshkumar – Appellant
Versus
The State of Maharashtra – Respondent
Writ Petition Nos. 14087, 14098 of 2023, Interim Application No. 13356 of 2024
Decided On : 12-12-2025

Advocates Appeared:
For the Appellants : Kishor Patil, Sidheshwar Biradar
For the Respondents: V.S. Nimbalkar, Shraddha Pawar, Dilip Bodake, Anil Sakhare, Siddharth Ronghe, Pratik B. Rahade

The court affirmed that repeated failures to comply with statutory duties under the Maharashtra Co-operative Societies Act justify disqualification of the entire Managing Committee to ensure transparency and accountability in cooperative governance.

Headnote:(A) Maharashtra Co-operative Societies Act, 1960 - Sections 77A and 154B-23 - Writ petitions challenging supersession of Managing Committee and disqualification for non-compliance with document supply - Petitioners' argument that disqualification was unjustified due to alleged delays in payment ignored repeated requests for documents - Court held disqualification lawful given the breach of statutory obligations by the entire Managing Committee, with evidence of failing to comply with a clear directive from the District Deputy Registrar - Court confirmed the powers exercised under the Act by the Registrar to ensure transparency and accountability in society management. (Paras 1, 11, 12, 19, 26, 35)

Facts of the case:
Petitioners were elected members of the Managing Committee, faced complaints for non-supply of documents requested by a member, leading to their disqualification and appointment of an administrator by the Registrar to manage the Society.

Findings of Court:
The Court found disqualification for five years justified due to documented failures to supply meeting minutes despite repeated inquiries, highlighting the collective failure of the Managing Committee.

Issues: Whether the Registrar was empowered to disqualify the Committee for failing to supply documents and whether such disqualification is too harsh.

Ratio Decidendi: The Managing Committee’s duty to transparently manage the Society is paramount; established failure to comply with statutory requirements warrants disqualification to protect member rights and Society's integrity.

Result: Writ petitions dismissed; orders under Sections 154B-23 and 77A(1) confirmed.

Table of Content
1. challenge to managing committee disqualification (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 4)
2. argument on document supply obligations (Para 5 , 21 , 22 , 23)
3. opposition claims regarding document requests (Para 6 , 7 , 24)
4. court's review of evidence and process (Para 8 , 9 , 10)
5. legal issues on disqualification grounds (Para 11 , 19)
6. legal interpretation of sections 154b-8 and 154b-23 (Para 12 , 15 , 17 , 18 , 20)
7. distinction between inspection and document supply (Para 14 , 16)
8. analysis of registrar's authority and actions (Para 26 , 27 , 32 , 33)
9. final judgment on petitions and relief (Para 35 , 36 , 37)

JUDGMENT :

AMIT BORKAR, J.

1. The first petition, Writ Petition No. 14087 of 2023, challenges an order passed under Section 77A of the Maharashtra Co-operative Societies Act, 1960. By that order, the Managing Committee consisting of the petitioners stood superseded. The companion petition, Writ Petition No. 14098 of 2023, challenges the order passed under Section 154B-23. That order has disqualified the petitioners from holding the post of Managing Committee members for five years.

2. The facts giving rise to these petitions are stated here. On 20 November 2022, the petitioners were elected as members of the Managing Committee of respondent No. 8 Society. On 18 January 2023, respondent No. 4 emailed the Society seeking copies of minutes of Managing Committee meetings held since October 2022. On 23 February 2023, the District Deputy Registrar, Pune directed the Society to provide the documents sought by respondent No. 4 upon payment of prescribed fees within forty-five days of such payment. On 10 March 2023 and 30 March 2023, respondent No. 4 again sent emails seeking the minutes and seeking information about the fees payable under by-law 170. On 11 April 2023, respondent No. 4 lodged a grievance before the District Deputy Registrar regarding non-supply of documents. On 12 April 2023, the District Deputy Registrar passed an order under Section 154B-27(1) directing the Society to supply documents within seven days and submit a compliance report. On 10 May 2023, the Society emailed respondent No. 4 asking him to pay Rs. 260 for copies of minutes. On the same day, respondent No. 4 deposited copy charges of Rs. 307. On 12 May 2023, the Society supplied minutes of Managing Committee meetings up to February 2023.

3. On 26 April 2023, respondents 4 to 6 filed a common complaint alleging breach of the Society’s by-laws. On 28 April 2023, respondent No. 3 issued a show cause notice to the Society proposing action under Section 154B-23(3). Copies of the notice were served on all Managing Committee members. The petitioners filed a reply on 15 May 2023 contesting the allegations. On 26 May 2023, respondent No. 3 passed an order under Section 154B- 23(3) disqualifying the petitioners and debarring them from contesting Society elections for five years. On 29 May 2023, respondent No. 3 passed a further order under Section 77A(1) appointing an administrator over the Society.

4. On 12 June 2023, the petitioners filed Revision Application No. 236 of 2023 challenging the order passed under Section 77A. On 27 October 2023, respondent No. 2 dismissed the revision application as well as the appeal filed by the petitioners. The present writ petitions came to be filed on 3 November 2023. On 30 November 2023, this Court issued Rule and granted interim relief. The Supreme Court confirmed the interim relief on 10 April 2024.

5. Learned counsel Mr. Kishore Patil submitted that the right to seek copies of documents under Section 154B-8 arises only after payment of dues. He submitted that the Society must supply copies within forty-five days from the date of payment of requisite fees. He pointed out that respondent No. 4 paid charges on 10 May 2023 and the Society supplied minutes on 12 May 2023. He submitted that disqualification of the entire Managing Committee cannot be justified on the allegation of non-supply of documents. According to him, non-su

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top