Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
AMIT BORKAR
Vijay Lakhi – Appellant
Versus
Minister of Co-operation – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. challenge to managing committee dissolution (Para 1 , 2 , 3) |
| 2. arguments on legal procedures for committee appointment (Para 4 , 5 , 6 , 7 , 8 , 9 , 10 , 11 , 12 , 13) |
| 3. analysis of section 77a's purpose and application (Para 14 , 15 , 16 , 17 , 18 , 19 , 20 , 21 , 22 , 23 , 24 , 25 , 26 , 27 , 28 , 29 , 30) |
| 4. understanding the tiered approach under section 77a (Para 31 , 32 , 33 , 34 , 35 , 36 , 37 , 38) |
| 5. legal collapse of committees under disqualification or resignation (Para 39 , 40 , 41 , 42 , 43 , 44 , 45 , 46) |
| 6. applicability of co-option and appointment procedures (Para 47 , 48 , 49 , 50 , 51) |
| 7. last resort of authorised officer appointments under crisis (Para 52 , 53 , 54) |
| 8. impact of legislative amendments on committee control (Para 55 , 56 , 57 , 58 , 59 , 60 , 61 , 62) |
| 9. necessity of notice before registrar's intervention (Para 63 , 64 , 65 , 66 , 67) |
| 10. registrar's powers and duties under section 77a (Para 68 , 69 , 70 , 71 , 72 , 73 , 74) |
| 11. duration and conduct of committees under management (Para 75 , 76 , 77 , 78 , 79 , 80 , 81) |
| 12. timelines for conducting elections upon appointment (Para 82 , 83 , 84) |
| 13. final findings and order on the writ peti |
The court affirmed that the Registrar must prioritize internal management over external control in co-operative societies, using outside appointments only as a last resort.
Removal of a managing committee under Section 78A of the Maharashtra Cooperative Societies Act requires clear evidence of misconduct and proper procedural compliance.
The managing committee ceases to hold office after six years per legislative amendments, authorizing administrator appointment under Section 77A.
A managing committee must have more than two thirds of its sanctioned strength as elected members throughout its term; failure to meet this threshold results in an invalid constitution.
Government resolutions under the Maharashtra Cooperative Societies Act are directory, not mandatory, and disqualification requires valid procedural compliance and adherence to principles of natural j....
A society's governing body's term is strictly limited to three years; any extension requires new elections rather than relying on financial year definitions, emphasizing the importance of statutory c....
for any reason if a new committee or the management for any reason whatsoever is not elected before the expiry of the term or that such Committee having been held is not functioning, as is the case o....
The appointment of an Administrator for a cooperative society cannot extend beyond one year without elections, infringing on statutory governance mandates.
The court affirmed that repeated failures to comply with statutory duties under the Maharashtra Co-operative Societies Act justify disqualification of the entire Managing Committee to ensure transpar....
The court establishes that the removal of a co-opted member from a cooperative society must adhere to Rule 43-A, failing which any subsequent actions are void.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
