Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
AMIT BORKAR, J.
Vijay Lakhi –Appellant
Versus
Minister of Co-operation –Respondent
WRIT PETITION NO.11625 OF 2025
Decided On : 6-10-2025
Key Points: - The judgment outlines a graded approach under Section 77A(1) prioritizing internal management (clauses (i) and (ii)) before resorting to outsiders (clause (iii)) (!) (!) . - It requires that the Registrar publish a notice inviting objections unless urgency or impracticability is shown, and in such cases must record reasons in writing for dispensing with notice (!) (!) (!) . - It holds that the 2024 Government Resolution reducing strength and quorum for small housing societies is prospective, not retroactive, and cannot validate pre-2024 committees (!) (!) (!) (!) . - Clause (i) is limited to filling casual vacancies within a functioning committee; if quorum is already lost, clause (i) cannot apply (!) (!) . - Clause (ii) empowers forming a temporary committee of up to three members from within the society when the committee has ceased to function, and may include remaining elected members if eligible (!) (!) (!) (!) . - Clause (iii) allowing one or more authorised officers (outsiders) is a last resort, with maximum six to twelve months tenure (subject to order) and strict supervision by the Registrar (!) (!) (!) . - The Registrar must ensure the interim or authorised officers are impartial, within the scope of the order, and initiate elections within a defined timeframe (4–8 weeks) to restore elected management (!) (!) . - Post-amendment rules delete the third proviso allowing appointment of outsiders merely due to member unwillingness; outsiders require demonstration of collapse or deadlock and necessity (!) (!) (!) . - The decision to appoint outsiders must show that lesser remedies were not workable and must justify necessity to protect the society’s interests (!) (!) . - The judgment directs elections be initiated within two weeks in this case and completed at the earliest (concluding order) (!) (!) . - The General Body retains policy authority, but Section 77A provides a statutory remedy when the committee collapses below quorum (!) (!) .
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. challenge to managing committee dissolution (Para 1 , 2 , 3) |
| 2. arguments on legal procedures for committee appointment (Para 4 , 5 , 6 , 7 , 8 , 9 , 10 , 11 , 12 , 13) |
| 3. analysis of section 77a's purpose and application (Para 14 , 15 , 16 , 17 , 18 , 19 , 20 , 21 , 22 , 23 , 24 , 25 , 26 , 27 , 28 , 29 , 30) |
| 4. understanding the tiered approach under section 77a (Para 31 , 32 , 33 , 34 , 35 , 36 , 37 , 38) |
| 5. legal collapse of committees under disqualification or resignation (Para 39 , 40 , 41 , 42 , 43 , 44 , 45 , 46) |
| 6. applicability of co-option and appointment procedures (Para 47 , 48 , 49 , 50 , 51) |
| 7. last resort of authorised officer appointments under crisis (Para 52 , 53 , 54) |
| 8. impact of legislative amendments on committee control (Para 55 , 56 , 57 , 58 , 59 , 60 , 61 , 62) |
| 9. necessity of notice before registrar's intervention (Para 63 , 64 , 65 , 66 , 67) |
| 10. registrar's powers and duties under section 77a (Para 68 , 69 , 70 , 71 , 72 , 73 , 74) |
| 11. duration and conduct of committees under management (Para 75 , 76 , 77 , 78 , 79 , 80 , 81) |
| 12. timelines for conducting elections upon appointment (Para 82 , 83 , 84) |
| 13. final findings and order on the writ petition (Para 86 , 87 , 88 , 89 , 90 , 91 , 92 , 93 , 94 , 95 , 96 , 97 , 98 , 99 , 100 , 101 , 102 , 103 , 104 , 105 , 106 , 107 , 108 , 109 , 110 , 111 , 112) |
JUDGMENT:
AMIT BORKAR, J.
1. By this writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India, the petitioners have challenged the judgment and order dated 1 July 2025 passed by respondent No.1. By the said order, respondent No.1 confirmed the judgment and order dated 18 March 2025 of respondent No.2, which in turn had confirmed the judgment and order dated 26 November 2024 of respondent No.3. Respondent No.3, while exercising powers under Section 77A of the Maharashtra Co-operative Societies Act, 1960 , dissolved the existing managing committee of respondent No.4 society and appointed an Administrator to conduct fresh elections. The order was passed on the ground that four members of the managing committee, which consisted of eight members, had resigned, thereby reducing the committee below the required quorum.
2. The relevant facts are that elections of the managing committee of respondent No.4 society were held on 9 January 2022 for the term 2021–2022 to 2025–2026. Petitioner Nos.1 to 4, respondent Nos.5, 7, and 9, and one Mrs. Tamanna Ailani were elected as members of the managing committee. On 11 April 2023, respondent No.5 resigned. On 20 June 2023, respondent Nos.7 and 9 tendered their resignations. On 29 June 2023, Mrs. Tamanna Ailani also resigned.
3. On 7 January 2024, the petitioners co-opted two members to fill the vacancies. Thereafter, on 7 March 2024, respondent Nos.5 to 10 moved an application under Section 77A of the Act. On 26 November 2024, respondent No.3 passed an order dissolving the managing committee of the petitioners and appointed an independent Administrator. The appeal filed by the petitioners was dismissed by respondent No.2 on 18 March 2025. The revision filed by the petitioners was also dismissed by respondent No.1 on 1 July 2025. Hence, the present writ petition has been filed.
4. Shri Godbole, learned senior counsel appearing for the petitioners, submitted that the Registrar, while exercising powers under Section 77A (1), was bound to publish a notice inviting objections and suggestions to the proposed action. Dispensing with such notice can be justified only if the Registrar records satisfaction that immediate action is necessary, or that publication of such notice is not reasonably practicable. He submitted that in the present case, neither urgency nor impracticability was shown.
5. Learned counsel further submitted that under sub-section (1) of Section 77A , the Registrar is first required to consider the courses available under clauses (i) and (ii). Only after recording satisfaction that those courses are not possible, can the Registrar proceed to appo
The court affirmed that the Registrar must prioritize internal management over external control in co-operative societies, using outside appointments only as a last resort.
Removal of a managing committee under Section 78A of the Maharashtra Cooperative Societies Act requires clear evidence of misconduct and proper procedural compliance.
The managing committee ceases to hold office after six years per legislative amendments, authorizing administrator appointment under Section 77A.
A managing committee must have more than two thirds of its sanctioned strength as elected members throughout its term; failure to meet this threshold results in an invalid constitution.
Government resolutions under the Maharashtra Cooperative Societies Act are directory, not mandatory, and disqualification requires valid procedural compliance and adherence to principles of natural j....
A society's governing body's term is strictly limited to three years; any extension requires new elections rather than relying on financial year definitions, emphasizing the importance of statutory c....
for any reason if a new committee or the management for any reason whatsoever is not elected before the expiry of the term or that such Committee having been held is not functioning, as is the case o....
The appointment of an Administrator for a cooperative society cannot extend beyond one year without elections, infringing on statutory governance mandates.
The court affirmed that repeated failures to comply with statutory duties under the Maharashtra Co-operative Societies Act justify disqualification of the entire Managing Committee to ensure transpar....
The court establishes that the removal of a co-opted member from a cooperative society must adhere to Rule 43-A, failing which any subsequent actions are void.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
