SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Bom) 1603

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
SHREE CHANDRASHEKHAR, CJ., GAUTAM A. ANKHAD
Sandeep Thakur – Appellant
Versus
State of Maharashtra, Through Urban Development Dept. – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Petitioner:Mr. Sandeep Thakur, the Petitioner is present in-person, Mr. Karl Tamboly with Mr. Sanjeel Kadam, Ms. Nitisha Lad, Advocates, i/by Kadam & Company
For the Respondent:Mr. O.A. Chandurkar, Additional Government Pleader with Smt. G.R. Raghuwanshi, Assistant Government Pleader for Mr. Tejesh Dande with Mr. Bharat Gadhavi, Advocates for Mr. Ashish Kamat, Senior Advocate, with Mr. Harsh Moorjani, Mr. Samsher Garud, Ms. Vidhi Karia and Mr. Atharva Gade, Advocates, i/by Jaykar & Partners, for Dr. Milind Sathe, Senior Advocate, with Mr. Bhushan Deshmukh and Mr. Mani Thevar, Advocates, i/by Ganesh & Co., for Mr. Somnath Kekan, ADTP, NMMC is present., Mr. Kiran Khandare, Deputy Engineer, NMMC is present.

Table of Content
1. public interest litigation concerning illegal constructions (Para 1 , 2 , 3)
2. petitioner's allegations on illegal constructions (Para 4 , 5 , 6 , 7 , 8)
3. court's analysis on procedural propriety and laches (Para 10 , 11 , 12 , 13 , 14 , 15 , 16 , 17 , 18)
4. dismissing the pil without condonation of illegality (Para 19 , 20)
5. final order on dismissal and future accountability (Para 21)

JUDGMENT :

GAUTAM A. ANKHAD, J.

The petitioner is a social activist, who claims that he has filed several Public Interest Litigations in the past. He has approached this Court alleging that numerous buildings within the jurisdiction of the respondent no.2–Navi Mumbai Municipal Corporation (“NMMC”) have been constructed illegally, without adherence to sanctioned plans and planning laws. It is further alleged that several such buildings are already occupied despite the absence of an occupation certificate (“OC”). The petitioner, therefore, seeks multiple reliefs, including initiation of inquiries against the concerned architects, a direction to the respondent no.2 to immediately take steps to vacate buildings that are occupied without a valid OC and demolition of all illegal construct

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top