ASHUTOSH J.SHASTRI
FARUK ABDUL KADARBHAI MEMON – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF GUJARAT – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
ASHUTOSH J. SHASTRI, J.
1. By way of this petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, the petitioner has prayed for the following reliefs:-
B. Pending hearing and final disposal of the present petition the respondent no 2 may be directed not to take any coercive steps against the property of the petitioner situated in city survey. nos. 2679, 2680,2681 and 2722/A/3 in Raikhad Ward of the Ahmedabad city.
C. Any other and further relief in the interest of justice may kindly be granted.
2. The case of the petitioner is that the petitioner is car
Dipak Kumar Mukherjee Vs. Kolkata Municipal Corporation and others reported in (2013)5 SCC 336
K. Ramadas Shenoy v. Chief Officers
Virender Gaur v. State of Haryana (1995) 2 SCC 577
Pleasant Stay Hotel v. Palani Hills Conservation Council (1995) 6 SCC 127
Pratibha Coop. Housing Society Ltd. v. State of Maharashtra (1991) 3 SCC 341
G.N. Khajuria (Dr) v. Delhi Development Authority (1995) 5 SCC 762
Manju Bhatia v. New Delhi Municipal Council (1997) 6 SCC 370
M.I. Builders Pvt. Ltd. v. Radhey Shyam Sahu (1999) 6 SCC 464
Friends Colony Development Committee v. State of Orissa (2004) 8 SCC 733
Shanti Sports Club v. Union of India (2009) 15 SCC 705
Priyanka Estates International Pvt. Ltd. v. State of Assam (2010) 2 SCC 27
Sciemed Overseas Inc. Vs. BOC India Limited and others reported in (2016)3 SCC 70
Bhaurao Dagdu Paralkar Vs. State of Maharashtra and others reported in (2005)7 SCC 605
Gowrishankar v. Joshi Amba Shankar Family Trust (1996 (3) SCC 310)
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.