SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Bom) 1762

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
RAVINDRA V. GHUGE, ASHWIN D. BHOBE, JJ.
Nandini Prakash Ingawale - Appellant
Vs.
The State of Maharashtra - Respondent
Writ Petition No. 5697 of 2025 and Writ Petition No. 11866 of 2025, Interim Application No. 10976 of 2025, Writ Petition No. 7574 of 2025, Writ Petition No. 12431 of 2025, Writ Petition (ST.) No. 18156 of 2025, Writ Petition No.8987 of 2025, Writ Petition No. 5706 of 2025, Writ Petition No. 11411 of 2025, Writ Petition No. 11409 of 2025, Writ Petition No. 11412 of 2025
Decided On : 09-10-2025

Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Parties : Mr. Pratik Balasaheb Rahade, Ms. Sakshi Thombre, Ms. Sonali Pawar i/b. Mr. Sandeep Dere, Mr. Ajit Hon, Mr. P.P. Kakade, Addl. GP a/w. Mr. V.G. Badgujar, AGP and Mrs. G.R. Raghuwanshi, AGP

The Court affirmed the necessity of adhering to established eligibility criteria in nursing admissions, ruling that illegal admissions cannot be condoned, ensuring educational integrity and fairness in the process.

Headnote:(A) Indian Nursing Council Act, 1947 - Relevant guidelines and eligibility criteria for admissions to ANM/GNM programs upheld - Petitioners, having obtained admissions in violation of specified qualifications, sought continuation in the program despite illegal entries which undermines educational integrity. (Paras 5, 10, 19, 23)

(B) Illegal Admissions - Colleges must adhere to established educational criteria; deviation results in cancellation of permits. The court ruled that allowing such admissions contradicts the principles of justice and equality under Article 14. (Paras 19, 20)

Facts of the case:
The Petitioners, after receiving illegal admissions to ANM/GNM courses, contended that their admissions should not be voided while others in similar situations retained their status. However, the Board indicated they lacked the requisite qualifications. (Paras 2, 10)

Findings of Court:
The Court determined that the illegal admissions could not be condoned; they undermined the regulatory framework of nursing education and set a precedent for similar cases affecting the integrity of the admissions process. (Paras 21, 23)

Issues: The primary issues addressed included whether illegal admissions should be overlooked, and if the Court should act to prevent perpetuating these illegalities. (Paras 19)

Ratio Decidendi: The court emphasized the need to uphold the law above restoring rights to unqualified candidates and stressed the imperative to maintain standards in nursing education. Equity could not be granted in violation of educational norms. (Paras 20, 21)

Result: Writ petitions dismissed; admissions of all Petitioners cancelled, and monetary remedies directed against the Colleges for damages. (Para 23)

Table of Content
1. legal admissions process for nursing courses (Para 2 , 4 , 5 , 6)
2. arguments on legality of past admissions (Para 7 , 8 , 9 , 10 , 13)
3. importance of adherence to admission regulations (Para 11 , 16 , 19 , 22)
4. issues of illegal admissions and their consequences (Para 15 , 20)
5. final decision to cancel admissions (Para 23 , 24 , 25)

JUDGMENT :

(PER : RAVINDRA V. GHUGE, J.) :

1. Rule. Rule made returnable forthwith and heard finally by the consent of the parties.

2. All these Petitioners have suffered cancellation of their admissions to the 1st semester of the 1st Year (3 years course) by the Indian Nursing Council (hereinafter referred to as ‘INC’), due to which their admissions to the Auxiliary Nurse Midwifery (ANM)/General Nursing and Midwifery (GNM), have been cancelled. The Respondent Nursing Colleges have also informed the INC as well as the students about the cancellation of their admissions. Yet, some of them have been allowed to sit in the classrooms as if they are legally admitted students.

3. Therefore, some of these Petitioners approached this Court seeking urgent orders as they were disallowed from appearing in the 1st semester of the 1st Year exam. The learned predecessor Bench passed an ad-interim order on 29th July 2025, allowing the Petitioners to appear for the 1st semester exam. All of them have, therefore, been permitted to appear for the 1st semester examination, which begins from 23rd September, 2025, and ends on 26th September, 2025.

4. These Petitioners are students who were admitted to the 3 years course in the admission process that started in October, 2024. They secured admission to the ANM/GNM courses in the Nursing Colleges after their 12th Standard exams. Thereafter, the INC commenced its routine verification exercise. The INC informed the Registrar of the Maharashtra State Board of Nursing and Paramedical Education (hereinafter referred to as ‘the State Board’), Directorate of Medical Education and Research, Mumbai, vide communication dated 24th February, 2025, which is as under :

“Sub : To get Guidance on the following matters – reg

Madam,

This has reference to your letter no.MSBNPE/12588/2024 dated 24.02.2024 on the subject noted above, by keeping in mind the eligibility criteria for ANM and GNM programme, the Vocational stream -specialization (extracted from the CBSE list of Vocational Subjects- copy enclosed) as stated below can be considered for the admission to ANM & GNM programs :

• S.no.13 (c) Yoga Anatomy and Physiology,

• S.no.14 - Ophthalmic Techniques,

• S.no.15 - Medical Laboratory Technology (Laboratory Machine (Clinical Pathology, Hematology & Histopathology, Clinical Biochemistry, Microbiology)

• S.no.16 - Auxiliary Nursing & Midwifery (Fundamentals of Nursing II, Community Nursing II, Maternity & Child Health Nursing II) - (for GNM program)

• S.no.17 - X-Ray Technician- (Radiation Physics, Radiography I (General), Radiography II (Special Investigation, Imaging and Radiograph)

This issues with the approval of Competent Authority.”

5. The Registrar of the Board, who was present in the Court hall on 22nd September 2025, submitted that after due verification of the Applications of these Petitioners, these 22 students (the Petitioners) were found to have been admitted illegally, along with 68 others. He submitted that these are not irregular admissions, but illegal admissions.

For example, our attention was drawn to one Petitioner, namely, Kole Priyanka Tukaram. Her 12th Standard curriculum was in the “HSC Vocational” stream. Following were her subjects for the 12th standard :

“01 ENGLISH 02 MARATHI

90 GENERAL FOUNDATION COURSE

X1 COMPUTER TECHNIQUE 1

X2 COMPUTER TECHNIQUE 2

X3 COMPUTER TECHNIQUE 3

31 ENVIRONMENT EDUCATION”

By way of another example, he has cited the case of the Petitioner, Mhaske Balaji Navnath, who had the following subjects in his HSC Vocational stream :

“01 ENGLISH

02 MARATHI

90 GENERAL FOUNDATION COURSE

L4 CROP SCIENCE 1

L5 CROP SCIENCE 2

L6 CROP SCIENCE 3

31 ENVIRONMENT

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top