SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Ker) 68

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
ANIL K.NARENDRAN, MURALEE KRISHNA S., JJ.
Sri Ramakrishna Sarada School Of Nursing, Sri Ramakrishna Ashrama Charitable Hospital, Represented By Its Principal, Sreedivya P. V., D/o. Padmanabhan Nair – Petitioner 
Versus
State Of Kerala, Represented By The Principal Secretary To The Government, Health And Family Welfare Department and Ors. – Respondents
WA No. 66 of 2026
Decided On : 27-01-2026

Advocates Appeared:
For the Petitioner: Sri. George Poonthottam Sr. Counsel, Sri. K. Shaj, Smt. Beena N. Kartha, Sri. Arun Chand, Shri. Bharat Vijay P., Shri. Kevin James, Shri. Akash Joshi, Smt. Minu Vittorria Paulson, Smt. Gopika Gopal, Smt. Archana P.P., Shri. Ren Shibu, Smt. Shehroon Patel A.K., Shri. Issac Melvin B.O., Shri. Alvin Joseph.
For the Respondents: Smt. Nisha Bose, Sr. GP Sri. S. Ganesh, SC, Sri. Vivek Menon, SC, Dr. Abraham P. Meachinkara, SC, Smt. Shameena Salahudheen, SC.

An institution that upgrades from a General Nursing and Midwifery course to a B.Sc. Nursing course is prohibited from reopening the GNM course under current regulations.

Headnote:(A) Kerala High Court Act, 1958 - Writ Petition under Article 226 - Challenge to the refusal of suitability certificate for General Nursing and Midwifery (GNM) course - The court holds that an institution that has upgraded from GNM to B.Sc. Nursing cannot initiate a new GNM course - The decision not to grant a suitability certificate was upheld based on regulations from the Indian Nursing Council - The court finds no grounds for appeal against the learned Single Judge's ruling. (Paras 3-14)

(B) Administrative law - Binding nature of administrative orders - The decision of educational bodies regarding course offerings must adhere to established regulations; lack of challenge against binding administrative conditions noted. (Paras 10-11)

Facts of the case:
The appellant institution, after years of offering a GNM course, challenged the denial of a suitability certificate for reopening it after upgrading to a B.Sc. Nursing program. The Indian Nursing Council mandated GNM programs to close post-upgrade.

Findings of Court:
The court affirmed the Single Judge's dismissal of the writ petition, stating that the refusal of the suitability certificate was not unlawful or perverse.

Issues: Whether the appellant can commence a GNM course after upgrading to B.Sc. Nursing and whether the refusal of the suitability certificate was justified.

Ratio Decidendi: The court reasoned that under existing regulations, once an institution upgrades its program, it forfeits its ability to reoffer the earlier program, affirming the rights of the regulatory body to enforce compliance.

Result: Writ appeal dismissed.

Table of Content
1. historical context of nursing course approvals. (Para 1 , 2)
2. arguments regarding the nursing course regulations and application. (Para 3 , 5 , 6 , 7 , 8 , 9)
3. legal basis for the single entry-level nursing policy. (Para 4 , 11 , 12)
4. court's confirmation of regulations and decisions. (Para 10 , 13)
5. dismissal of the writ appeal. (Para 14)

JUDGMENT :

Muralee Krishna S., J.

The petitioner in W.P.(C)No.33806 of 2025 filed this writ appeal under Section 5(i) of the Kerala High Court Act, 1958, challenging the judgment dated 17.12.2025 passed by the learned Single Judge, whereby W.P.(C)No.33806 of 2025 and W.P.(C)No.40066 of 2025 filed by another college of nursing were dismissed.

2. Going by the averments in W.P.(C)No.33806 of 2025, the appellant has been offering the General Nursing and Midwifery (‘GNM’ for short) Course for several years. On 28.02.2019, the 3rd respondent, Indian Nursing Council (‘INC’ for short), issued Ext.P1 notification in tune with the National Health Policy, 2017, that there should be a single entry level for nursing, resolving that the existing GNM Course shall be phased out by the year 2020-2021 and shall be converted into College of Nursing. The said notification was issued to ensure the quality of nursing education; the implementation framework seeks to merge GNM schools with B.Sc. Nursing and have a single entry-level qualification as B.Sc. Nursing for nurses by redesigning the B.Sc. curriculum as practical based and by phasing away the GNM course. By Ext.P3 letter dated 19.09.2019, the 3rd respondent requested the State Government/State Nursing Council to ensure that no new GNM School of Nursing shall be approved from the academic year 2019- 20 and no inspection of GNM School of Nursing shall be conducted for the purpose of renewal/restart/enhancement of seats etc. The appellant then sent a letter dated 02.12.2019 to the 3rd respondent requesting reconsideration of discontinuing GNM course, as the course helps many poor girl candidates studying under the appellant institution to lead a good life. To that request, the 3rd respondent sent Ext.P4 reply dated 24.12.2019 stating that the decision to discontinue the GNM course is final and that offering B.Sc. Nursing is the only alternative as it is part of the National Health Policy. In the meantime, in the year 2020, the entire country underwent the COVID-19 pandemic, and there was a shortfall of medical professionals and nurses. Therefore, the National Health Policy underwent severe changes, and the decision to discontinue the GNM course was rolled back, and the permissions were granted by all States to start GNM courses.

2.1 The appellant further pleads that the parent hospital of the appellant filed Ext.P5 application dated 20.07.2024 before the 1st respondent, State of Kerala, seeking No Objection Certificate (NOC) to commence a GNM course. Thereafter, the 1st respondent conducted necessary inspections in the appellant institution and, upon being satisfied with the infrastructure and manpower, by Ext.P6 order dated 16.10.2014 granted No Objection Certificate to commence the GNM course with an intake of 40 seats. Ext.P6 NOC stipulates several conditions, the first among them is that the appellant institution shall have the standards, which are prescribed by the 3rd respondent INC as per their Regulations published from time to time. The second condition is that the appellant shall comply with the guidelines, orders and regulations which are issued by the 1st respondent, State of Kerala and the 2nd respondent, the Kerala Nurses and Midwives Council, from time to time. The third condition is that the appellant shall obtain an approval from the 2nd respondent and suitability certificate from the 3rd respondent, and a letter of permission from the 1st respondent before admitting students.

2.2 The appellant states that after receiving Ext.P6 NOC, the appellant submitted Ext.P7 application dated 17.10.2024 before the 2nd respondent for the

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top