SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Bom) 1971

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
SHREE CHANDRASHEKHAR, CJ., GAUTAM A. ANKHAD, J.
Green Gene Enviro Protection And Infrastructure Limited – Petitioner 
Versus
The State of Maharashtra & Ors. – Respondents
Writ Petition No.2885 of 2025
Decided On : 24-12-2025

Advocates Appeared:
For the Petitioner:Mr. Zal Andhyarujina, Senior Advocate a/w Ms. Akanksha Aggrawal i/by Abhishek Mehta a/w Mr. Gaurav Raj Shrawat & Mr. Tushar Khatri, Advocates
For the Respondents:Ms. P. H. Kantharia, GP a/w Mr. Vishal Thadani, Addl. Govt. Pleader, Mr. Jayprakash Sen, Senior Advocate a/w Mr. Vishwanath Patil, Ms. Nidhi Chauhan, Advocates, Mr. Prashant Chavan, Senior Advocate a/w Ms. Komal Jadhav & Mr. Meet Vora i/by Navdeep Vora & Associates, Advocates, Mr. M. G. Bhangde, Senior Advocate a/w Mr. Shyam Dewani, Mr. Sumit Khanna & Mr. Chirag Chanani i/by Dewani Associates, Advocates.

The court ruled that unilateral amendments restricting operational area without due process violate natural justice and contravene the HWM Rules, quashing the amendment.

Headnote:(A) Environment (Protection) Act, 1986 - Hazardous and Other Wastes (Management and Transboundary Movement) Rules, 2016 - Amendment in Circular dated 15th February, 2024 challenged - Petitioner-company’s Consent to Operate amended unilaterally by inserting Clause 19, which restricted operational area - Court found this action illegal and arbitrary since it infringes on the petitioner’s rights under Article 19(1)(g) of the Constitution of India. (Paras 1, 11, 12, 13, 19)

(B) Natural Justice - Unilateral amendment of consent without hearing the petitioner constitutes a violation of principles of natural justice, resulting in interference by the court. (Paras 6, 17)

(C) Promissory Estoppel - The petitioner’s reliance on previously granted clearances established a legitimate expectation, warranting judicial protection against arbitrary restrictions imposed by the respondents. (Paras 9, 10, 18)

(D) Jurisdiction of State Pollution Control Board - The court ruled that there is no provision within the HWM Rules authorizing the Board to restrict operational areas, thus rendering the amended circular unconstitutional. (Paras 14, 19) (E)

Result: Writ Petition allowed, and the amendment in the circular and clause in Consent to Operate quashed.

Table of Content
1. challenge to the amendment of the cto (Para 1 , 2)
2. petitioner’s operational background and reliance on cto (Para 3)
3. counterargument by mpcb regarding agreements (Para 4)
4. details of the amended cto (Para 5)
5. petitioner's claims of natural justice violations (Para 6 , 7)
6. writ petition maintainability argument (Para 8)
7. promissory estoppel doctrine application (Para 9 , 10 , 11)
8. impact of the amending circular on petitioner’s operations (Para 12 , 13)
9. hwm rules: responsibilities and powers (Para 14 , 15 , 16)
10. mpcb's obligations under the tripartite agreement (Para 17 , 18)
11. court's ruling on the legality of the amended circular (Para 19)
12. conclusion: quashing of the amended circular and clause 19 (Para 20 , 21)

JUDGMENT :

Shree Chandrashekhar, CJ.

The Green Gene Enviro Protection and Infrastructure Limited (hereinafter referred as the “petitioner-company”) is aggrieved by the amendment in Circular bearing No.MPCG/RO(BMW)/Circular/B-92 dated 15th February, 2024. It has challenged the consequential change in its Consent to Operate (in short, “CTO”) issued on 12th June, 2025. The petitioner-company states that it is directly impacted by the insertion of clause 19 in the CTO dated 12th June 2025 by which the area of its operation has been restricted and reduced to almost negligible. According to the petitioner-company, the action of the respondent no.2-Maharashtra Pollution Control Board (hereinafter referred to as “MPCB”) in incorporating Clause 19 in the CTO dated 12th June 2025 is illegal, arbitrary, discriminatory, unreasonable and a colourable exercise of power by it.

2. For easy reference, the Amended Circular dated 15th February, 2024 is reproduced hereinbelow:-

Date: 15/02/2024

AMMENDMENT IN CIRCULAR

Sub: Amendment in Pre-processing/Co-processing of Hazardous Waste in the State of Maharashtra.

Ref: 1. The Hazardous and Other Wastes (Management and Transboundary Movement) Rules, 2016

2. CPCB Guidelines for Pre-Processing and Co-Processing of Hazardous and Other Wastes in Cement Plant as per H& OW (M & TM) Rules, 2016.

3. Board Office Order vide No. MPCB/ROHQ/HSMD/TSDF/GK/B-3098 dtd. 14/05/2008

4. CPCB Letter vide No. CP-21/1/2022-TECH-RD-PUNE-RD (Pune)/544 dtd. 18/04/2022

5. Board's Circular vide No. MPCB/RO(BMW)/Circular/B-220823-FTS-0199 dtd. 23/08/2022.

6. Approval of Office Note vide No. 231227-FTS-0017 dtd. 01/02/2024.

The Board has issued the Circular regarding Pre-processing/Co-processing of Hazardous Waste in the State of Maharashtra vide No. MPCB/RO(BMW)/Circular/B-220823-FTS-0199 dtd. 23/08/2022.

Thereafter the Board has received representation from Common Hazardous Waste Collection Treatment and Disposal Facility located at Ranjangaon and Butibort alongwith the copies of tri party agreement dtd. 13/08/2004 between Maharashtra Industrial Development Corporation (MIDC), Maharashtra Pollution Control Board (MPCB) and M/s. Shaktikumar M. Sancheti Limited (M/s. SMS).

The above said representation were discussed before all technical HoD's of MPCB and also discussed with the expert Committee and it was decided to amend the Circular issued vide above reference No. 5 so as to ensure the compliance with the legal binding of the agreement that has been executed between MPCB, MIDC and Operator (M/s. SMS) which is valid for a period of 20 years from the Commencement of Operations or till completion of full Closure of the site whichever is later. Therefore, the last Paragraph of Circular issued on 23/08/2022 is hereby amended and shall be read as follows:

A) While granting the consent to the industries located in the operational area of CHWTSDF at Ranjangaon and Butibori as per the Order issued by the Board vide referred at Sr. No3 following condition shall be incorporated till period of 20 years from the Commencement of Operations or till completion of full Closure of the site whichever is later:

“Disposal of Hazardous waste for Co-processing shall be routed through pre-processing at CHWTSDF located at Ran

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
Judicial Analysis

AI

SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top