Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
SARANG V.KOTWAL, SANDESH D.PATIL
Kanchan G. Rohira – Appellant
Versus
Nirman Constructions Pvt. Ltd. – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. linked appeals from partial specific performance decree (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 4 , 5) |
| 2. 1977 registered sale agreement details and prayers (Para 6 , 7 , 8 , 9) |
| 3. defendant claims bona fide purchase without notice (Para 10 , 11 , 12) |
| 4. trial evidence on readiness and due diligence (Para 13 , 14 , 15 , 16 , 17 , 18 , 19 , 20) |
| 5. trial court finds invalid termination, awards damages (Para 21 , 22 , 23 , 24 , 25 , 26 , 27) |
| 6. improper discretion; constructive notice from registration (Para 28 , 29 , 30 , 31 , 32 , 33 , 34 , 35) |
| 7. no readiness; bona fide purchaser; wide discretion (Para 36 , 37 , 38 , 39 , 40 , 41 , 42 , 43 , 44 , 45 , 46 , 47 , 48) |
| 8. plaintiff ready; time not essence by conduct (Para 49 , 50 , 51 , 52 , 53) |
| 9. no constructive notice without index proofs (Para 54 , 55 , 56 , 57 , 58 , 59 , 60 , 61 , 62 , 63 , 64 , 65 , 66 , 67 , 68) |
| 10. section 20 discretion favors long possessor (Para 69 , 70 , 71 , 72 , 73 , 74 , 75 , 76) |
| 11. decree confirmed; appeals dismissed (Para 77 , 78 , 79) |
JUDGMENT :
[Per Sarang V. Kotwal, J.]
1. Both these Appeals are decided by this common judgment because they arise out of the same judgment and decree Deshmane(PS) dated 14.1.2010 pass
Subsequent purchaser protected from specific performance if bona fide for value without notice; constructive notice requires full registration proof including indexes; discretion under S.20 denies re....
(1) Second Appeal – Jurisdiction of High Court in second appeal under Section 100 of CPC is strictly confined to the case involving substantial question of law.(2) Written Statement – Mere failure or....
The main legal point established in the judgment is the court's affirmation of the specific performance of the agreement of sale dated 05-8-1995, and the rejection of the 4th defendant's claim as a b....
The court upheld that without explicit provisions for severability in contracts, specific performance can be enforced, provided the plaintiff demonstrates readiness and the contractual agreement is v....
The court's decision was influenced by the lack of good faith, absence of notice, and delay in filing the suit, which disentitled the plaintiff to specific performance.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
