Medasani Ananda Naidu VS Manchu Mohan Babu Bhakthavathsalam Naidu

Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation

VENUTHURUMALLI GOPALA KRISHNA RAO
Medasani Ananda Naidu – Appellant
Versus
Manchu Mohan Babu Bhakthavathsalam Naidu – Respondent

Advocates:
Counsel for the Parties:
For the Appellant: Vedula Srinivas
For the Respondents: N Ashwani Kumar

JUDGMENT

This second appeal under Section 100 of the Code of Civil Procedure (“C.P.C.” for short) is filed aggrieved against the Judgment and decree, dated 27.08.2018 in A.S.No.7 of 2012, on the file of learned X Additional District Judge, Tirupati, Chittoor District, setting aside the Judgment and decree, dated 16.11.2011 in O.S.No. 357 of 2004, on the file of learned Principal Senior Civil Judge, Tirupati.

2. The appellant herein is the plaintiff, the 1st respondent herein is the 4th defendant and the respondents 2 to 4 herein are the defendants 1 to 3 in O.S.No.357 of 2004, on the file of learned Principal Senior Civil Judge, Tirupati.

3. The plaintiff initiated action in O.S.No.357 of 2004, on the file of learned Principal Senior Civil Judge, Tirupati, with a prayer for specific performance of an agreement of sale directing the defendants to execute a regular registered sale deed pursuant to agreement of sale dated 9.8.2004 by receiving balance sale consideration in favour of the plaintiff and for permanent injunction restraining the defendants, their men and agents, followers etc., from in any way interfering with the plaintiff’s peaceful possession and enjoyment of the plaint