IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY AURANGABAD BENCH
VIBHA KANKANWADI, HITEN S.VENEGAVKAR
Tapi Valley Agro Food Products Company – Appellant
Versus
Dondaicha Warwade Nagar Parishad – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. slaughterhouse lease history and disputes background. (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 4) |
| 2. municipal duties versus lease validity challenges. (Para 5 , 6) |
| 3. writ maintainable despite alternate remedies. (Para 7 , 8 , 9) |
| 4. decree operative pending appeal without stay. (Para 10 , 11) |
| 5. refusals judged solely on stated reasons. (Para 12) |
| 6. mandamus enforces municipal slaughterhouse duties. (Para 13 , 14) |
| 7. section 308 no bar to writ relief. (Para 15 , 16) |
| 8. quash refusal; direct noc issuance. (Para 17 , 18 , 19 , 20) |
JUDGMENT :
HITEN S. VENEGAVKAR, J.
1. Rule. Rule is made returnable forthwith. With the consent of the parties, the petition is taken up for final disposal at admission stage.
2. This petition under Article 226 of the Constitution is instituted by a partnership firm claiming to be an agro-based enterprise operating from Dondaicha, District Dhule, Maharashtra. The reliefs are directed substantially against respondent nos.1 to 3 (the Nagar Parishad and its authorities) and seek (i) a direction to issue forthwith a No Objection Certificate (NOC) to enable respondent no.4 to appoint veterinary doctors for ante-mortem examination for running the slaughterhouse, and for conseq
Whirlpool Corporation v. Registrar of Trade Marks
Harbanslal Sahnia v. Indian Oil Corporation Ltd.
Atma Ram Properties (P) Ltd. v. Federal Motors (P) Ltd.
M/s Paul Rubber Industries Pvt. Ltd. v. Amit Chand Mitra & Anr.
Rai Chand Jain v. Miss Chandra Kanta Khosla
Commissioner of Police, Bombay v. Gordhandas Bhanji
Tata Cellular v. Union of India
Andi Mukta Sadguru Shree Muktajee Vandas Swami Suvarna Jayanti Mahotsav Smarak Trust v. V.R. Rudani
Municipal refusal of NOC for slaughterhouse veterinary appointments illegal if based on appeal pendency without stay, disregarding operative civil decree; writ maintainable to enforce public duty for....
The court held that the U.P. Pollution Control Board exceeded its authority in revoking the consent to operate without evidence of non-compliance, affirming that prior approvals remained valid.
Licence and permission are to be granted in accordance with the provisions of Act or any rule or bye-law. Which thus means when the Municipality is vested with powers to entertain an application for ....
Point of Law : As per Section 127(3) of A.P. Panchayat Raj Act, 1994, every application for a licence or permission under the Act shall be disposed of within fifteen days from the date of receipt the....
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.