SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Bom) 511



JUDGMENT :

AMIT BORKAR, J.

1. Since the factual matrix, the surrounding circumstances, and the questions of law arising in all these petitions are substantially identical, they are being disposed of by this common judgment.

2. In Writ Petition No.11982 of 2025, the petitioner assails the order dated 21 August 2025 passed by the Divisional Joint Registrar in Revision Application No.217 of 2025, whereby the order dated 9 June 2025 passed by the Assistant Registrar permitting the Chief Promoter of respondent No.9 society to open a bank account in the name of the proposed society came to be confirmed.

3. In Writ Petition No.11988 of 2025, the challenge is to the order dated 21 August 2025 passed by the Divisional Joint Registrar in Appeal No.61 of 2025, by which the order dated 17 June 2025 passed by the District Deputy Registrar was affirmed. By the said order dated 17 June 2025, the District Deputy Registrar rejected the petitioner’s application under sub section (1) of Section 10 of the Maharashtra Ownership Flats Act, 1963 on the ground that the developer had already initiated steps for formation of a cooperative society and that permission had been granted by the Assistant Registrar t

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top